What do you want most in a friend — someone who is intelligent, or someone who has a sense of humor, or someone who is reliable? Which one of these characteristics is most important to you? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice.
In life, we have plenty of type friends, for example, some of them are permanent whereas others are life-long friends. If I really had to choose from these options, I would definitely prefer a trustworthy friend. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, having a loyal friend is very beneficial because it gives you a sense of security. To be more specific, if you tell her your secret, you do not need to worry about others will know because she will not tell anybody about it. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. Since I was six years old, I have had only one friend, Hulan, who is always with me whatever I have encountered. She has been always the most reliable one over a long period. When I knew that I was pregnant, I told this news only my friend, not my family. This is mainly due to the fact that I was afraid of judgements and critics toward me and my baby. However, when she heard about it, she completely understood me and gave me the time to tell my family about it by myself. Today she is my boy’s godmother and still my best friend.
On top of this, sometimes we confront some problems that we have not people who can trust. Even though having a genius and funny friend makes you happy sometimes, but as long as they cannot trustworthy, they will not become your life-long friend. Drawing from my own experience, seven years ago, I was a student at a college. I had plenty of friends who could make me laugh and make me admire them. However, they did not become my life-long friends because I could not count on them completely. My college friend, Saina, who was the most genius one in my faculty and I really respect her on account of her wisdom. However, she could not accept me as her friend because I was not smart enough to interact and align with her. Since that time, I truly understand that loyalty is a far better quality of friend because it demonstrates that they can rely on you and they accept you as an important person of their lives.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that honesty is an essential feature of best friends. This is because it gives you sensation of protection and this is because it helps you to identify who is your life-long friend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | rohitbibra | 60 | view |
| 2017-05-13 | Delara | 76 | view |
| 2016-08-11 | sadra1988 | 76 | view |
| 2016-03-30 | younes.tatari | 80 | view |
- tpo33Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of |locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 80
- TPO 11 a decline in reading the literature 94
- tpo27 80
- Every year forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affecte 89
- tpo25 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...confront some problems that we have not people who can trust. Even though having a gen...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dentify who is your life-long friend.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, still, whereas, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 96.0 43.0788530466 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46948356808 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45247988485 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1329012134 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5454545455 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167402036026 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526012572906 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491721952358 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107633227713 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445106344091 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.