TPO25-an archeologists finding

Essay topics:

TPO25-an archeologists finding

The lecture and the passage discuss the usage of an ancient vessel which has been found recently. Although the passage claim that the founded vessels is not used for generate electricity, the speaker refutes this idea through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.

First and foremost, the passage points out that the vessels should be attached to some metal wire to generate electricity and the further excavations do not found any wires, the spekaer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that these vessels have been found by local people who did not familiar with the importance of the artifacts. Therefore, they might throw out the other ancient things they had found due to the fact that they might not recogonize the usage and the signifigance of them.

Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the cylinder inside the clay jars is as the same as the Seleucia cylinder which has been discovered before and it was exploited to holding the scrolls, the speaker argues that it is possible that this copper cylinder were used to holding scrolls but the irons that have been found near the jars indicate that they were used to generate electricity.

Finally, although the passage says that generating electricity was useless for the ancient people due to the reason that they did not have a device to use the generated electriciy, the professor disagrees by mentioning that those ancient people used this generated electricity to prove an evidence of their magical powers. He also mentions that on those ancient time, people used this electricity for the purpose of the healing since the electricity can stimulate the muscules.

Through the reasons which have been described above, the passage claims are rejected by the professor.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-11-28 paras2 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to generating'.
Suggestion: used to generating
...d near the jars indicate that they were used to generate electricity. Finally, although the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08904109589 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51555491163 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489726027397 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.061325182 49.2860985944 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.75 110.228320801 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5 21.698381199 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428927009708 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178115237039 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941213778293 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218906255355 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105042836732 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.3589403974 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.