TPO27
The reading specifies that there are three possible reason to cause the little ice age. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and bring up three points to reject the specific point made in the reading passage.
First of all, reading states that disruption of ocean current caused cooling. Nevertheless, the author say effect of disrupting of ocean currents only happening in specific parts like Europe and it can not explain the colder weather in southern Africa.
Second, according to the reading, volcanic eruption have a rule in little ice age. In contrary, the speaker explain that the volcano did not make enough dust to make this effect and also human did not report anything like snow gray and visual effect because of the dust. So, the dust was not strong enough.
Third, based on the reading, decreases in human population may help indirectly to lowering the temperature. In contrast, the lecturer states that the decrease in human population change immediately and changes to grow back and also forest was not long enough to cause cooling by absorb carbon dioxide.
Therefore, the specific points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 71
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 78
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 60
- Working as group member is better than individuals 73
- TPO 11 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ioned in the reading do not make sense.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04663212435 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41218282959 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4452135772 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283209041152 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115073018705 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967647262414 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124175275867 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685377376111 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.