The lecturer dispute the author's suggested evidence that peary have reached the north pole in April 7, 1909. He provides several concrete reasons to cast doubt the author's claims.
First, according to the author there is enough evidence to support peary's arrival to the north pole because the National Geographic committee has announced the news after thorough investigation. The lecturer, however, finds this idea debatable. He contends that there are doubts that peary indeed reached the North Pole because many members of the committee were peary's friends who financially supported his trip.Thus, there is a possibility that the investigation is not accurate.
Secondly, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since Avery trip to the North Pole took only 37 days, then the duration of peary trip is reasonably accurate. He contend that there are a couple of differences between Avery trip and Peary trip. First is the weight of the dog slide which was lighter, and secondly, Avery trip weather conditions was no favorable. so, theoretically speaking there is enough evidence to support peary's arrival to the North Pole.
Finally, the author claims that the photographs of the sun position is an evidence that peary did reach the North Pole because the shadow measurement is accurate. Again the lecturer refutes these claims by stating that the sun position cannot be measured in the pictures clearly because the camera is a primitive one with no high resolution. Moreover, a measurement of the sun angle cannot be detected clearly from the pictures
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'disputes'.
Suggestion: disputes
The lecturer dispute the authors suggested evidence that pea...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ends who financially supported his trip.Thus, there is a possibility that the invest...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'contends'.
Suggestion: contends
...f peary trip is reasonably accurate. He contend that there are a couple of differences ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ip weather conditions was no favorable. so, theoretically speaking there is enough...
^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ause the camera is a primitive one with no high resolution. Moreover, a measuremen...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...detected clearly from the pictures
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25691699605 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67140462929 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529644268775 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4413478873 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456627870424 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175853683258 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130802306925 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281307491215 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625750671646 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.