TPO29

Essay topics:

TPO29

The reading specifies that there are three argument to support the migration hypothesis of edmontosaurs. However, the professor explains that this arguments are not convincing and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, reading states that Edmontosaur fed on plants and its diet support the idea that they migrate. Nevertheless, the speaker say that the Edmontosaurs do not need to migrate because in past the weather was warmer and during the summer sunshine help vegetation to grow up and when winter comes, the Edmontosaurs could use the nutrient of this dead vegetation. Hence, they could easily live there.
Second, based on the reading, the fact that Edmontosaurs live in herds support that they migrated like many modern-day animals. In contrast, the lecturer believes that there are many reasons to live in the herds and of this reason is for extra protection form predators and it is not necessary for them to migrate.
Third, according to reading, Edmonosaurs were physically capable of travel long distance to reach hospitable regions. On the contrary, juvenile Edmonosaurs could not migrate this long distances and also edmonosaurs do not leaver their juvenile in the cold weather. If they migrate, they have to leaving their juveniles in that cold weather. Therefore, whole herds of the Edmontosaurs stay and live in that cold weather.
Therefore, the specifics points mentioned in the reading to not make sense.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-18 Aliakbari94 70 view
2020-03-04 eeemmmyyy 70 view
2019-10-31 reza1994 73 view
2019-10-09 haoboooo 81 view
2019-08-31 hosna69 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s. However, the professor explains that this arguments are not convincing and refute...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27631578947 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74958725462 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2708603295 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327657705392 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110737906956 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071193320629 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149402707298 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918813948851 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.