Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of children’s education engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that parents are more involved in their children’s education. However, some others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that people in the past were more concerned with children’s education compared to the present day. In my point of view, nowadays parents are more inclined toward the education of their children. I will pinpoint my outstanding reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first aspect to point out is that parents are more cognizant of their roles in life of their children. Nowadays, advancement of human’s knowledge are happening at a very fast pace. Parents understand that their societies change from the old days. Therefore, it is become very hard to find a job these days. In past days, it was not crucial for children to get a college or university degree for having a career. But, with enhancement of technologies, human’s job become more sophisticate that before. Furthermore, it is an undeniable fact that today having a degree is very important requirement for jobs. Parents are familiar with this situation and encourage their children to study more than before. By this way they can make a better future for their children.
A further more subtle to point out is that people allocate all their time on new emerging technologies. In the past time children after completing their homework go outside and play with their friends. In contrasts, children are spending all their time on video game consoles. The effect of this device on children are very destructive. For example, this kind of video game make children’s mind busy all the time and because of it children become addictive to this kind of game. Hence, they do not assign their time of doing their assignments. Moreover, if children spend most of their time on this game they become very angry. Many of this game’s nature are based on killing a person. Therefore, children gain a progressive behavior by playing this kind of game which is dangerous of their future. Parents who see this kind of behavior from their children, do not let them to proceed like this. They prevent their children to play this game since consume all their time or let them play after they finish their homework.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, since the knowledge of the parents increase in last years and new technologies have a destructive effect on children’s study and behavior, parents are more concerned compared to the past. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embrace due to the time.
- A/D: “It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.” 76
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 70
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guid 73
- TPO 8 the Chevalier s memoir accuracy 80
- “Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office.” 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...me on new emerging technologies. In the past time children after completing their homewor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12967032967 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8966616082 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5777652407 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4444444444 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8518518519 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383227903776 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114898714305 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989916797313 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250401750356 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745938369159 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.