TPO31
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable explanations to refute the hypothesis regarding the pattern of fine lines surrounding the backbones of Sinasauropteryx, which was a dinosaur that its fossil was unearthed in China, were an indication of feathers. However, find the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text, and states the proofs are very strong; hence, the critics mentioned in the reading are entirely unpersuasive.
At first, the author argues that this precise pattern may not function as feather since the decay of skin fibers in volcanic ash would produce such fine line after the animal death. Conversely, the professor contends that this idea is not feasible. Having not observed any decomposition skin in the fossils discovered in that site, scientists repudiate this idea. In fact, since the skins of dinosaurs was well-preserved in its shape beneath the ash, the archeologists are of the opinion that the feathers were remained based on its origin figure as well.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the resemblance of the relics of frills with these fine lines has ratified that this pattern was the remains of frills not feathers. On the other hand, the lecturer dismisses this point by clarifying the fact that the components constituting the frill are chemically varied from the elements of feathers. Indeed, feathers have included special kind of protein which frills do not contain, and the examination has been scrutinized on the fine lines has endorsed that having contained the protein, the fine lines are undoubtedly debris of feathers.
Finally, the author asserts the idea that the fine lines placed on parts of body which would not represent the thermoregulation function of the feather, thereby it could not have been feathers. The professor, thought, repudiate this idea by subscribing the fact that there are some other usages for feather such as a specie of bird that utilize its feather to attract the mate. She adds that according to this issue that the investigation on the fine lines revealed there were colorful including orange and white; it had the same benefit for the Sinasuapteryx.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | noushinhaddad | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | atefehndi | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | ali.hasani1992 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | Hamide | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 37
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than any other factors To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- Getting the advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, well, in addition, in fact, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16574585635 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80416540343 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.844636015 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.833333333 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413100042166 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139546581222 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697206026052 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240652881698 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347637185852 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.7273730684 182% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.