tpo4
Both of the reading and lecture are about dinosaurs which have been conceived as endotherms or warm-blooded. The reading provides three reasons that these animals were warm-blood like humans and they could maintain their body temperature constant. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that fossils' dinosaurs were discovered from polar region, so for surviving in such a harsh climate, they had to keep an internal temperature like endotherms. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She points out that during dinosaurs' time, the climate was different than today and polar areas may have experienced warm weather, also during cold days, these creatures could migrate to other areas or hibernate like modern reptiles.
Secondly, the article contends that endotherm creatures' legs are usually located under body for running and so on and dinosaurs were including such a leg position; in the contrast, the professor believes that having legs under body does not mean that they needed such legs for saving energy during running, but this mentioned structure of body helped dinosaurs tolerate their extra weigh which was very advantageous for them.
Finally, the reading passage states that researchers could find herversian canals in dinosaurs' bone structure. These canals are one of the endotherms' features which allow animals to grow quickly. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer again and she expresses that besides of harversian canals, dinosaurs' bone structures include the growth ring. The aforementioned ring showed that dinosaurs' growth was stopping or slowing during cold months, while endotherm animals do not experience such a halt even during cold seasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | tststs | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | theprasad | 70 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? people nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past or not. 76
- should people be far away from lovely relationships for a long time or not. 88
- Tpo32 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 84
- Tpo42 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...nosaurs time, the climate was different than today and polar areas may have experien...
^^^^
Line 8, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ng. The aforementioned ring showed that dinosaurs growth was stopping or slowing during c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4476534296 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58424251466 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.1055035124 49.2860985944 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.