tpo40
The reading and the lecture are about the possible condition of life on Venus. The reading provides three reasons that because of the inappropriate circumstance of Venus, this idea will not be practical and then supports them. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that Venus has a danger surface due to an unusual high pressure; consequently, Venus's surface can crush any spacecraft as well as humans. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He contends that this problem can be solved if we construct a station higher than Venus's surface. There will be a safe position as much as 50 meters above of surface. In such a distance, the pressure is equal with Earth's pressure; as a result, human beings can take advantage of this.
Secondly, the article claims that Venus's atmosphere is not adequate for providing life because it seldom includes oxygen and unfortunately it has a lot of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid. Meanwhile it lacks of water source; subsequently, carrying of water and oxygen from Earth are impossible. This argument is rebutted by the professor. He points out that we do not need to carry these materials to Venus. Researchers would make oxygen and water through a chemical reaction between carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid simply.
Finally, the reading passages states that since Venus has thick clouds, so the huge amount of sunlight would be reflected to space by the clouds; hence, the idea of life on Venus without sun and its heat can be ridiculous. On the other hand, the lecturer suggests that the clouds that are located higher than surface are not much thick, so that aforementioned station will be able to save the sun's heat and also this station can collect the reflected radiations from below and high for generating electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ot be practical and then supports them. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments dubious. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...on dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid. Meanwhile it lacks of water source; subsequently,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00628930818 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6489487934 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0784158996 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349891078342 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966451098722 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582677654994 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192211334206 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408584673512 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.