tpo43
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the how the Agnostids behaved. While the reading part lists three theories as the possible explanation for the Agnostids behavior, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information mentioned in the text.
First of all, the reading passage mentions to the free-swimming predator's hypothesis as the feasible living habit for the Agnostids. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this surmise. As she states, the open ocean predators should have the big and sharp eyes to be able to prey the animal. On the contrary, these animals owned the tiny eyes with the poor vision, or even some of them were blind. As a result, the Agnostids did not have this ability to prey. Even if they utilized the other sensory capabilities to rely on them for prey, there is no evidence in the fossils that the Agnostids possessed those features.
Next, meanwhile, the article posits that the Agnostids were the seafloor dwellers, the professor refutes this assumption. Based on her assertion, the seafloor dwellers do not have this ability to move fast, and they occupy in the consistent geographical spot, where they produced. On the other hand, there is evidence that Agnostids had been lived in the multiple areas, and they were widespread in a very fast pace which is not usual for the seafloor dwellers.
Finally, the passage assumes that they were the parasites since lots of modern-day arthropods are parasites. In the contrast, the lecturer challenges the validity of this claim by mentioning to the population of Agnostids. The population of parasites should be a limited number; otherwise, they will kill off whole big fishes. However, based on the fossils excavated there is a vast number of Agnostids, which opposes with the possibility of this assumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- tpo9 86
- do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very things well. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined within a month. The city of Amburg has recently begun police patrols on bicycles in its business district, but the rate of 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...nd lecturer offer two opposing views on the how the Agnostids behaved. While the readin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predators'' or 'predator's'?
Suggestion: predators'; predator's
...g passage mentions to the free-swimming predators hypothesis as the feasible living habit...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'even so', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242074927954 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.132564841499 0.158904122519 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0778097982709 0.0723426182421 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0403458213256 0.0435111971325 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.028818443804 0.0277247811725 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121037463977 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0230547550432 0.0370669169778 62% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68318268159 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0230547550432 0.0208969081088 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0028818443804 0.00154638098197 186% => OK
Determiners: 0.172910662824 0.128158765124 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00864553314121 0.0158828679856 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0115273775216 0.0114777025283 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1889.0 1645.83664459 115% => OK
No of words: 310.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0935483871 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335483870968 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303225806452 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235483870968 0.187439937562 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151612903226 0.113142543107 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68318268159 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551612903226 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.1376108794 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6666666667 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7901054273 49.3711431718 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.878197800319 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 50.9892473118 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.91428571429 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.597163725388 0.549887131256 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137281324454 0.142949733639 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0622813574839 0.0787303798458 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.665010458752 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0970970185357 0.139662658121 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.296617517789 0.266732575781 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717868730493 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.524540574773 0.414875509568 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0736125360312 0.0530846634433 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.450996429507 0.40443939384 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686314034185 0.0528353158467 130% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.