TPO43
The reading specifies that there are three different theories that explain how agnostids may live in the past. The professor, however, explains that the theories have serious problems and provide some evidence to refute them all.
First, the passage asserts that the agnostids were strong swimmers predators that looking for smaller animal and hunt them because other types of primitive arthropods were free swimming and active predators. In contrast, the professor opposes the idea by saying that animal who swim and chase other animals have a well developed eye. On the other hands, the agnostids have tiny eye and sometime were blind. Also, researcher did not find and sense organic in the agnostide that help them to chase other species and it is not possible to consider them predators.
Second, according to the reading, the agnostids like the other types of primitive arthropods have dwelled on the seafloor. eating dead organisms or gazing on bacteria helps them to survive. Conversely, the lecturer states that the seafloor dwellers move very slowly and they stay on local area. But the agnostids were spread in a long distance and they have the ability to move very fast. Therefore, they were not subsist on the seafloor.
Third, based on the reading, the agnostids were parasites which living on and feeding off larger organisms. The reason is that there are many types of modern day arthropods that exist as parasites. Nevertheless, the population of agnostids were limit because if there were high, they kill all the organism on the sea. Moreover, the record of their great size do not say that they were parasites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 81
- TPO46 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 66
- old friends vs new friends 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Eating
...rthropods have dwelled on the seafloor. eating dead organisms or gazing on bacteria he...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'subsisted'.
Suggestion: subsisted
...ove very fast. Therefore, they were not subsist on the seafloor. Third, based on the r...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...vertheless, the population of agnostids were limit because if there were high, they ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'limited'.
Suggestion: limited
...eless, the population of agnostids were limit because if there were high, they kill a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06691449814 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4490834975 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0905199029 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586110629051 0.272083759551 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188223629157 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098928316656 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322702835327 0.162205337803 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839905666935 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.