TPO44 - INTEGRATED
In this set of materials, the reading states that some archaeologists think the coin that found is fake and brings up three different hyptheses to support. However, the lecture finds all the ideas wrong and believes that many scientists do not think they are not genuine and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that coin is found very far from the places which Norse presence. So, the large distance is good reason for thinking that coin is fake. In contrast, the lecture argues that there are very have same archaeological site far too and people on that time travel great distances. Thus, it is possible to bring this coin with them.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the reading passage that when there are not any other coins in these sites, the coin must not be genuine. On the contrary, the lecture contends that this reason not necessary proves this fact because Europian usaully pack up their coins and when they back to Europe they bring these packs entirely.
Finally, the author is of the opinion that the Norse knew about the useless of the coins in North America so there are not any reason for bring these coins with them. Conversely, the lecture explains that it is true that coins do not have use in North America but people of America value unusual objects and the coin was very interesting for them. In fact, this interesting causes the trade by coin in North America.
- TPO31-INTEGRATED 75
- TPO26-Do you or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their their parents' jobs. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 72
- TPO 13Do you agree or disagree ?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past? 42
- TPO44 - INTEGRATED 61
Comments
Essay evaluation report
some archaeologists think the coin that found is fake
some archaeologists think the coin that is found is fake
some archaeologists think the coin found is fake
from the places which Norse presence.
from the places where Norse presents.
the large distance is good reason
the large distance is a good reason
there are very have same archaeological site
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
this reason not necessary proves this fact
this reason does not necessarily prove this fact
Sentence: Finally, the author is of the opinion that the Norse knew about the useless of the coins in North America so there are not any reason for bring these coins with them.
Description: The token for is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to for and bring
Sentence: In this set of materials, the reading states that some archaeologists think the coin that found is fake and brings up three different hyptheses to support.
Error: hyptheses Suggestion: hypotheses
Sentence: On the contrary, the lecture contends that this reason not necessary proves this fact because Europian usaully pack up their coins and when they back to Europe they bring these packs entirely.
Error: usaully Suggestion: usually
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Read a good grammar book.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 254 250
No. of Characters: 1161 1200
No. of Different Words: 126 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.992 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.571 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.188 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.833 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.909 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.173 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231046931408 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.151624548736 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0758122743682 0.0723426182421 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0794223826715 0.0435111971325 183% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0397111913357 0.0277247811725 143% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126353790614 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.014440433213 0.0370669169778 39% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.27350529748 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.014440433213 0.0208969081088 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0072202166065 0.00154638098197 467% => OK
Determiners: 0.129963898917 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00361010830325 0.0158828679856 23% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014440433213 0.0114777025283 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1446.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 271.125827815 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69291338583 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.263779527559 0.374372842146 70% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.192913385827 0.287516216867 67% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.122047244094 0.187439937562 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0669291338583 0.113142543107 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27350529748 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515748031496 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 49.0243057612 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0909090909 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3310045593 49.3711431718 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.27272727273 0.878197800319 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 42.3822476736 50.5018328374 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.37333333333 1.90840788429 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.669692909154 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.158871684924 0.142949733639 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0959544504921 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645073009465 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139848381732 0.139662658121 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.335161452111 0.266732575781 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111746529519 0.103435571967 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.37726038842 0.414875509568 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0401591832278 0.0530846634433 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.487285857235 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796970858451 0.0528353158467 151% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.