Tpo45
In this set of material, the reading states that Dib bees could have not been 200 million years ago on the Earth. It brings three reasons that discovered fossil structures that resemble bee nests in Arizona are related with modern bees, however the professor find all reasons suspicious and provides some evidence to advocate that these bees have existing in 200 million years ago. The information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the passage.
First, the reading claims that any fossil bee has not found, in contrast the lecture argues that the fossils of bees usually preserve by a resin which the trees produces it. It is possible that in 200 million years ago, these types of trees had not evolved; as a result there was not any resin to preserve the fossils of bees.
Second, the author of reading contends since bees feed on flower plants and there were not any flowering plants in 200 million years ago, so this theory is not being accepted, on the contrary the professor declares that early bees could have fed on Non-flowering plants like fern or pin tree and after evolution of these plants to flowering plants, they have adapted to this kind of diet.
Third, the reading passage proposes that these found structures in Arizona have created by modern bees due to lack of some chemical composition in them, conversely the professor refutes this and express that in the fossils bees discovered a chemical material like waterproof substance, surprisingly when researchers analyzed modern bees, these substance found in them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
| 2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students hold 93
- Tpo42 82
- tpo20 80
- do you agree or disagree? technology has made world complicated. 76
- Tpo 7 3
Comments
Essay evaluation report
It brings three reasons that discovered fossil structures that resemble bee nests in Arizona are related with modern bees
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
these bees have existing
these bees have been existing
the lecture argues that the fossils of bees usually preserve by a resin which the trees produces it.
the lecture argues that the fossils of bees usually are preserved by a resin which the trees produce.
in the fossils bees discovered a chemical material like waterproof substance,
in the fossils bees, a chemical material like waterproof substance has been discovered ,
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 12
No. of Words: 260 250
No. of Characters: 1271 1200
No. of Different Words: 129 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.016 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.888 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.43 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.908 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.482 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.769 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.161 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this substance' or 'these substances'?
Suggestion: this substance; these substances
... when researchers analyzed modern bees, these substance found in them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259786476868 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.170818505338 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0569395017794 0.0723426182421 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0533807829181 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0213523131673 0.0277247811725 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138790035587 0.128828473217 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0498220640569 0.0370669169778 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4508662881 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.017793594306 0.0208969081088 85% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.131672597865 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00711743772242 0.0158828679856 45% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0142348754448 0.0114777025283 124% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1562.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00769230769 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357692307692 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276923076923 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176923076923 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0923076923077 0.113142543107 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4508662881 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526923076923 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 50.9913222927 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 37.1428571429 21.7502111507 171% => OK
Sentence length SD: 113.202725863 49.3711431718 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 223.142857143 132.220823453 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1428571429 21.7502111507 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 0.878197800319 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 64.8351648352 50.5018328374 128% => OK
Elegance: 1.82608695652 1.90840788429 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402030735837 0.549887131256 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.213923751488 0.142949733639 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0665639223388 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.798218876965 0.631733273073 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156157634795 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260902796451 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572572943609 0.103435571967 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.322721481087 0.414875509568 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0976466374954 0.0530846634433 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293912962272 0.40443939384 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579336878317 0.0528353158467 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.