TPO45
The reading claims that some structures of bees nests were found in the state of Arizona indicates that bees were lived at 200-milion-years ago, but some skeptics were about the theory. The authors elaborates his skeptics in three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor believes that it is perfectly possible that bees exist on the Earth as early as 200 milion years, and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the reading posits that no fossil remains ever have been found and earliest one is only about 100 milion years old. However, the professor refutes this concept by providing that no fossil doesn't mean no bees were, and she indicates that really rare condition need to preserve fossil such a sticky liquid resin from special tree; hence, didn't finding fossil is only because of the this tree only become avalible much later than 200 milion years.
Furthermore, the article avers that absence of flowering plants which only become from 120 milion years ago is powerful reason since bees and flowers have evolve a close relationship. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the fact that it is true this kind of plant only avalible from 120 milion years ago but bees lived without them as some ancient bees could. Also, she states Fern and Pine trees which were really good adabtable source of foods for ancient bees.
Finally, the article asserts that some crucial structure of the bees nest like caps that have a spiral pattern were not in the Arizon't bees structure; so, fossilized structure must made by other insect. Contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim by stating that although some evidence were true about it, but some chemical evidence which found on structure shows that exact water proof chemical substance used from these bees as modern bees use for water proofing and it perfectly illustrated that these insects must be kind of ancient bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'elaborate'.
Suggestion: elaborate
...tics were about the theory. The authors elaborates his skeptics in three main reasons. Nev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...his concept by providing that no fossil doesnt mean no bees were, and she indicates th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... liquid resin from special tree; hence, didnt finding fossil is only because of the t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...didnt finding fossil is only because of the this tree only become avalible much later th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'evolved'.
Suggestion: evolved
...rful reason since bees and flowers have evolve a close relationship. On the other hand...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...ich found on structure shows that exact water proof chemical substance used from these bees...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, nevertheless, really, so, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94339622642 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27559346546 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550314465409 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.5668744316 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.2 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 21.698381199 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116342996873 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502478270428 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240752789858 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747367168277 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146183552704 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.