tpo 52
The reading claims that some sientists think that sending people to an asteroid is one of the perfect clonization option. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor believes that it is not practical sullotion since each of the author's reasons has a serious down-side.
First, the reading asserts that asteroids have much lower gravity which make them safity landing area. In addition more equipments and less fuel could carry with spacecrats on them. However, the professor refutes this concept by stating that low gravity also increase some health risks for human, like, lose muscle mass. Also, he states that astronats whom only lived a few months in the low gravity area, suffer from significant health problem like low density body structure.
Furthermore, the article avers that most of asteroids are rich in valuable elements like, gold, and platinum which make them profitabale to colonization on them. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the fact that although it is easy to obtain such elements, but cost of the colony and transporting elements whould increase their total price considerably. In addition, he mentioned that these high costs of golds are becuase of the rare character of them; hence, by offering more of them to the market, their price will decrease considerably.
Finally, the article posits that some of the asteroids would become very near to the earth which make it easy to land on them. Contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim by stating that whereas it is really easy to land on them but returning from them is hard since they have unusual orbit patterns which come near to the earth and after a while, go far far away from the earth and make it impossible or unprofitable to returning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | AT2G38040 | 85 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | lutzuming | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 70
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 85
- TPO-42 78
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO46 independentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support y 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...which make them safity landing area. In addition more equipments and less fuel could car...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the asteroids') or simply say ''most asteroids''.
Suggestion: most of the asteroids; most asteroids
... Furthermore, the article avers that most of asteroids are rich in valuable elements like, gol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ly. Finally, the article posits that some of the asteroids would become very near to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: far
...near to the earth and after a while, go far far away from the earth and make it impossi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02013422819 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55343550563 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1638850412 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.