TPO45
In the reading passage, the writer contends that very old fossil structure, which have been found in the state of Arizona, that resembles bees' nests, could not be created by bees because of several reasons; however, in the lecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by presenting several reasons and points.
First of all, the writer claims that no fossils of actual bees have ever been found that date to that time, 200 million years ago; on the other hand, the professor takes issue with this belief and states that the absence of fossils' records cannot rejects the possibility of their existence. The professor asserts that it is possible there is no fossils of actual bees inasmuch as trees which could preserve them and represent them as a fossils in the future had not developed yet at that time.
Moreover, the writer also indicates that the absence of flowering plants which are critical for bees’ survival is another indicator to cast doubt on this theory; in contrast, the lecture material is against this view and states that bees probably fed on non-flowery plants at that time. They adapted to feed on flowering plants when they started to flourish.
In addition, the writer also declares that the structures lack some details of bees' nests; on the contrary, the lecture again rejects this notion and illustrates that even though the structure lack some details, but there is chemical evidence which are similar to water proof material created by today's bees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
| 2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
- It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than by similar view Do you agree or disagree 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 40
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 78
- TPO 40 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no fossils'?
Suggestion: there are no fossils
...e professor asserts that it is possible there is no fossils of actual bees inasmuch as trees which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fossil' or simply 'fossils'?
Suggestion: a fossil; fossils
...uld preserve them and represent them as a fossils in the future had not developed yet at ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 265, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
... chemical evidence which are similar to water proof material created by todays bees.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.052 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36893562597 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 21.2450331126 193% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.7106720374 49.2860985944 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 210.5 110.228320801 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6666666667 21.698381199 192% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.1666666667 7.06452816374 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0873504191377 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454480433632 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0166690792495 0.0662205650399 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534363160012 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136870452435 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.2 13.3589403974 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.9 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 10.7273730684 252% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.498013245 175% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.2008830022 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.