TPO48 Integrated Writing
The speaker and the writer hold divergent attitude towards using three solutions can prevent the decline of frogs, which can protect humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Through relevant reasons and examples, the professor extensively opposes the content in the article.
Frist, the author brings up if laws prohibit the use of pesticides near the frogs, the harm caused by pesticide will decrease. To refute this point, the lecturer emphasizes that this solution is not economically practical and fair. Without using pesticide, farms will face a great disadvantage and lose the competitive place in the market. They will confront low yield, which contradicts the assumption in the passage.
Second, the writer advocates that keeping people from using the water in the key water habitats of the frogs is a way to soften the decline, however, as is rebutted by the speaker, it is a large amount of labor because the treatment will be effective only by capturing the frog one by one and giving them anti fungal treatment individually. Besides, people have to do the same job to the descendants of the affected frogs again since the fungus can be passed on to the next generation from their parents. In summary, doing all this is complicated and expensive.
Third, opposing the writer’s belief, the professor contends that keeping people from using the water in the key water habitats of the frogs is not a way to soften the decline because global warming rather than human use mostly causes the disappearance of water habitats, which completely rejects the viewpoint shown in the passage.
- Little Ice Age 80
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you ch 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? There is never a reason to be impolite to others. 90
- Some people believe it is a good idea to use cameras to watch and record people’s activities in public since it can increase safety; others think it has too many negative consequences and should not be used. Which do you prefer and why? 90
- It is easier to be educated nowadays 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, second, so, third, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19540229885 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75971136379 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.8271882088 49.2860985944 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.6 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342902500169 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101973935952 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099714826178 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185667010416 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923812868764 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.