TPO62
Both the article and the lecture are about whether the idea of constructing artificial reefs is advantageous or not. In this vein, the author of the article brings up 3 reasons to support that artificial reefs are beneficial. The professor, on the other hand, believes that building one creates problems and refutes all the mentioned reasons.
First, the author refers to the construction of Mexico Gulf and the simultaneous increase in the Red Snapper Fish's population and points out that the artificial reef can increase marine animals' numbers. However, the professor disagrees with this notion and states that reefs exclusively attract marine animals. To be more specific, a reef stimulates animals to immigrate from one section of the ocean to another part. In this case, local fishers effortlessly hunt them and decrease their total number in the ocean. Therefore, the artificial reef would not be effective to enhance marine animals' numbers.
Second, the author posits that artificial reefs provide opportunities for local fishers to compete with larger corporations by creating private reefs. The professor, conversely, rebuts this issue and argues that these private reefs, most of which have secret locations for other fishers may cause damage to others' nets or boats. To avoid these detrimental consequences, artificial reef sites have to be reported, which leaves small-scale fishers with no competitive advantages over large companies.
Third, the author claims that artificial reefs can come in handy to easily and affordably recycle aged disposals like old cars. In contrast, the professor opposes this idea and takes Osborn Reef as an example to clarify this matter. As he explained, Osborn Reef, which was made up of old car tires, abruptly, got loose and crashed after a strong storm. Eventually, the destruction of Osborn Reef ruined the habitat of a plethora of marine plants and animals, which settled on its surrounding seafloor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO62 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO68 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...the artificial reef can increase marine animals numbers. However, the professor disagre...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ould not be effective to enhance marine animals numbers. Second, the author posits tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35064935065 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74544041574 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9642856256 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436167607158 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141778900806 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628876479831 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24977321943 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668920734098 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...the artificial reef can increase marine animals numbers. However, the professor disagre...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ould not be effective to enhance marine animals numbers. Second, the author posits tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35064935065 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74544041574 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9642856256 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436167607158 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141778900806 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628876479831 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24977321943 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668920734098 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.