In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate. Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities.
Both the reading and the lecture present an concept that reducing the
employee's work hour either improves the profits of the businesses or not.
According to the passage, reducing workload with employee's salary eventually raises
income, lowers unemployment problems and enhances the quality of employees' lives.
Still, the speaker denies completely
all the conclusions of the passage.
The reading suggests businesses will make more profit if the new strategy of
reducing the employee's pay is set as a weekly basis for decreasing work hours.
On the contrary, professor argues that it simply raises the costs
that new workers on the ground have to meet the requirements.
The writer mentions reducing the problems of unemployment, the speaker implies a conflicting idea by doing this, the situation could increase
the worth of the company, the workers provided overtime or would have done the same amount of work at reduced working hours.
There are no new work positions
that will increase in this situation.
Lastly, in perusing, writer believes quality of life has improved a lot, but the lecturer mentions another reason
to refute the argument, according to speaker, while increasing quality of life, it would increase the risk of jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...oth the reading and the lecture present an concept that reducing the employees w...
^^
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure present an concept that reducing the employees work hour either improves the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with employees salary eventually raises income, lowers unemployment problems and...
^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Still, the speaker denies completely all the conclusions of the passage. ...
^^^
Line 10, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make more profit if the new strategy of reducing the employees pay is set as a w...
^^^
Line 12, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r argues that it simply raises the costs that new workers on the ground have to m...
^^^
Line 17, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...doing this, the situation could increase the worth of the company, the workers pr...
^^^
Line 19, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hours. There are no new work positions that will increase in this situation. ...
^^^
Line 24, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but the lecturer mentions another reason to refute the argument, according to spe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, so, still, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49494949495 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67924413745 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3093111454 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.09492273731 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160059048372 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072189452367 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665104427327 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517355760892 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071537568128 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.