In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee

Essay topics:

In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate. Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities

In the reading, the writer suggests the benefits of fewer payments due to reduced working time in a week. He believes the new strategy would help the companies by raising their profits, to reduce unemployment problems, and finally, the workers would be benefited as their living standard increases. The speaker utterly rejects all the conclusions made in the writing.

In the reading, the writer suggests the benefits of fewer payments due to reduced working time in a week. He believes the new strategy would help the companies by raising their profits, to reduce unemployment problems, and finally, the workers would be benefited as their living standard increases. The speaker utterly rejects all the conclusions made in the writing.

Eliminating the amount of payment of employees, ultimately, increases the total cost of companies in spite of doing more income. Actually, recruitment of new employees would oblige the company to spend more money. These extra costs are used for ensuring additional office space, health manacles, purchasing new computers, etc, that really cut the profit.

The speaker elucidates that, the idea of the creation of new job positions will not work. It quite possible that, the companies may provide offer to the worker for overwork or they could expect the get the same amount of work at reduced workdays in a week. If it happens, the job would be much stressful, simultaneously unemployment problems remain the same. So, the economic condition will be unaffected.

The author is very hopeful on the ground that employees can have time to spend for their family, and, quality lives will be ensured. The lecturer completely holds the opposite views, he says that it absolutely raises the risk of losing their job, standards of lives would worsen. On top of that, the employees who would spend extra time for family have a lower chance to do better in the job market. The worker who does their best in the work caught the companies eyes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... economic condition will be unaffected. The author is very hopeful on the ground...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, if, may, really, so, in spite of, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08282208589 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6251665646 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9001118992 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169125799715 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602150489354 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415086369492 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100691590458 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282449848204 0.0443174109184 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.