In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in electronic databases rather than on paper. It is argued that storing patients' medical records in electronic databases has several advantages over traditional paper-based record keeping. Reducing Costs First, the use of electronic records can help reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring medical records. While paper records require a significant amount of storage space, electronic medical records take up virtually no space. Moreover, by having patients' records computerized in databases, doctors can easily access the records from almost anywhere and can easily duplicate and transfer them when necessary. This costs much less than copying, faxing, or transporting paper records from one location to another. Preventing Errors Second, electronic medical records are crucial to reducing the chances of medical errors. Illegible handwriting, improper transcription of data, and nonstandard organization of paper records have caused errors that in some cases have had serious consequences for the patients' health. In contrast, electronic records are associated with standardization of forms and legible computer fonts and thus minimize the possibility of human error. Aiding Research Third, electronic medical records can greatly aid medical research by making it possible to gather large amounts of data from patient records. It is often impractical, impossible, or prohibitively expensive to manually go through thousands of patients’ paper records housed in doctors' offices. However, with the existence of electronic medical records, it would be simple to draw out the needed information from the medical databases because the databases are already formatted for data collection. Once in the electronic system, the records could be accessed from any research location.
In this set of materials, the reading and the lecture both discus the possibility of keeping the records on paper or electronic system. While the reading states that there are efforts to convinced doctors to store their patients information electronically because of many advantages from this procedure, the lecture refutes this by mention that these advantages are uncertainly.
First to begin with, the reading states that electronic medical records cheaper than paper based one and paper storage records include a huge space in contrast to electronic databases. Moreover, its easy to access from any place and cheaper in transfer in opposite to paper databases which needs money to transfer and make copies. The lecture argues this information by mention that electronic databases is not make any money saving as the doctors don't through out the paper records of their patients for emergency back up and because contain signatures for legal records and will still storage these paper records even if use computers for their databases.
Second, the reading mention that electronic way will prevent errors, unreadable handwriting, and unorganized papers which in turn, will effect patients health because electronic database will minimize human errors. The lecture refutes these information as mention that poor handwriting and mistakes will not be prevented as the doctors still in use of pen and papers to take in medical formation from there patients during examination and their offices put on these info in computers. In addition if doctors write with a poor hand writings and the error will be typed by their offices and keeps as records so, this will not prevent errors from being records when doing an electronic database.
Lastly the reading says that its easy for researchers to get access to information if electronically recorded but the lecture states that its difficult to get access for medical information because the researchers need for permission from hospitals and patients to give them this access besides, many patients not accept to do this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jewel | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mucahit11 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | mamdouh97 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | shatealabo1110 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | shrjhn1234 | 80 | view |
- Agree or disagreeSuccessful leader should take quick decision because taking time in decision may affect people they lead. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meet 70
- agree or disagree the franchise is better than small business 60
- agree or disagreethe successful people need to take risk rather than do what they use to do 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ot make any money saving as the doctors dont through out the paper records of their ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ke any money saving as the doctors dont through out the paper records of their patients for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... unorganized papers which in turn, will effect patients health because electronic data...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...imize human errors. The lecture refutes these information as mention that poor handwriting and mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use of pen and papers to take in medical formation from there patients during exa...
^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n from there patients during examination and their offices put on these info in c...
^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this info' or 'these infos'?
Suggestion: this info; these infos
...g examination and their offices put on these info in computers. In addition if doctors wr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 491, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ices put on these info in computers. In addition if doctors write with a poor hand writi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3009118541 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67086271376 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465045592705 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1434800526 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.777777778 110.228320801 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5555555556 21.698381199 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7777777778 7.06452816374 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284306518448 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13110173642 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474651259946 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18687237482 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286615674003 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.3589403974 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 53.8541721854 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.