The speaker disputes the author's suggested theory that creating a fund to protect forests would lead to the preservation of forests. He provides several reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims
First, according to the author providing funds to encourage agriculture would prevent companies from demolishing forest because farmers would not leave their lands. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He asserts that indeed this may not protect forests because farmers are continuously looking for ways to increase their yields to meet the ever increasing demands. He asserts that this will encourage them to use fertilizers and pesticides which also harmful to the environment.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that providing funds to help people in education and healthcare would reduce the destruction of forests. However, the lecturer argues that this may not help in reducing forest destruction. He asserts that the governments are the owners of forest lands and not the people. Thus, providing this fund would go not to the real beneficiary, and as a result would not serve the objectives
Finally, the author claims the fund would protect forests because it may preserve the diversity of species living in forests. However, the lecturer also disputes these claims. He contends that giving money would not protect diversity of species because farmers would plant tree and might not be interested in supporting diversity.
- coins Norse 78
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 70
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 80
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, look, may, second, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44347826087 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6636387977 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513043478261 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9008139589 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902109846145 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405165634666 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282232083782 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585756944594 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261626354719 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.