write an essay.
The reading and the lecture are both about the application of smart cars. In regards to the passage, the writer feels that there are three possible explantaions for the safer, less expensive and quicker driving after the implementation of smart cars. The professor in the lecture, however, challenges the claim made by the author. He states that the introduction of smart cars not necessarily satisfies all of the merits as stated in the passage, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with the claims made in the reading text.
To begin with, the author of the passage states that introduction of advanced sensors minimizes the car accidents. Some professionals in this field stand in the firm opposition to that claim. In the listening, for example, the professor states that smart cars are more likely to increse the road accidents. Furthermore, he goes on to this by saying that the computerized system makes cars to be parked compactly, hence increasing the chances of collision between them.
One group of scholors, represented by author, feel that traffic problems will decrease to the minimum once the smart cars are used as they will be easy to manage. Of course, though, not all experts feels in the same way. Again, the speaker debunks this claim made by writer by positing that as the driving will get easier, more people will get attracted to driving, hence more traffic congestion on the road.
Finally, the writer wraps up his statement by saying that driving will less expensive after using smart cars as they use direct routes to travel using GPS. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this claim by contending that the cost of GPS and other sensors surpasses the profit made by fuel saving using direct route by smarr cars. Moreover, he notes that the smart cars will require more repairing and maintanance than mechanical cars, ultimately increasing the cost of driving.
To recapitulate, the writer and the speaker holds contrasting opinion about the application of smart cars. It is clear to see that they will have trouble finding common ground in this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 86 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Pling1809 | view | |
| 2022-05-14 | Pri_Judy | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Kaurab Gautam | 3 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | gizem er | 81 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorateDiscuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justifythose decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study 75
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they entercollege rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academiccourses to offer." 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...th about the application of smart cars. In regards to the passage, the writer feels that ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of smart cars not necessarily satisfies all of the merits as stated in the passage, and ad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, for example, of course, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05157593123 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62230724113 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495702005731 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5013736056 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1875 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.