Zoos 2
The article states that zoos are essential and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that there are problems with these arguments and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that animals are treated well in zoos. The professor refutes this point. He states that animals are not treated well. He explains that in a zoo, two read pandas died from exposure to rat poison. This shows a lack of care towards animals.
Second, the article claims that zoos are educational. However, the professor says that zoos are seen as entertainment. The animals in zoos are to attract visitors. He also states that we can’t understand them in zoos because they are in artificial and misleading exhibits.
Third, the reading claims that zoos protect endangered species. The professor says that this claim is problematic. He explains that zoos have a poor success rate with saving endangered species. He says that they offer no advantage to saving animals in their natural habitat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-01 | alishan2009 | 60 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 166.0 270.72406181 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17469879518 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5416333017 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 145.348785872 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8612656831 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.2666666667 110.228320801 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0666666667 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363356539616 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145975723762 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143326424768 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243541482848 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149749049934 0.0443174109184 338% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.52 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.