Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team).
There is a wide variety of proposals and projects that all governments are required to allocate sufficient budget for. In order to boost people's well-being physically and mentally, governments must support both art and athletics financially. When it comes to offering financial aids by governments, controversy surrounds the issue of whether a government should provide more funds for arts in comparison with athletics or not. Some people are of the opinion that since art is a source of recreational activities, governments should pay more attention. I believe, however, sports and athletes need to be supported by authorities of a country for the following reasons.
One of the most interesting aspects of the current discussion which needs to be reflected is that allocating attention to athletes and athletics would contribute to a healthy society. These days, it would be a common concern among parents who are not sure of their offspring's futures due to their addiction to drug, gambling and other illegal activities. In fact, parents do not know how to keep their children from not being affected by unhealthy atmosphere of a society in which taking drug has been an usual issue among even teenagers. Under these circumstances, it is the government's responsibility to protect tomorrow's parents by encouraging children to take part in sports, exercise and other athletics. For example, when a government set priority over sports through its financial assistance, such attitude will motivate children and adults to be one of those professional athletes in the future. In addition, they might set their favorites players as their role models who encourage their fans to have a healthy lifestyles.
Another noteworthy aspect of the ongoing discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that spending money on sports means boosing economy. If a government sets preference over sports, athletes especially those, who have international reputation in the world, can be a good motivator for their fans to watch their competitions. In this case, by increasing the number of fans from all over the world, the host country can generate considerable revenues by catching the tourists' attention to that country with it famous sports and athletes. This leads to local improvement, reduction in unemployment since all these fans need a place to stay, to eat, and someone to guide them in a foreign country.
To sum up, setting example of athletes as role models and economic improvement are the results of offering more financial supports by governments to athletes and sports.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-17 | wolves.co | 3 | view |
2018-08-01 | Springlovers | 60 | view |
2018-07-29 | zhangjuw16 | 75 | view |
- TPO11. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to somuch information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 90
- Tpo 28. Parents are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Agree or disagree. 70
- Tpo24. integrated 80
- 56 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition between friends always has a negative effect on their friendship 62
- tpo.15 80
have a healthy lifestyles.
have healthy lifestyles.
Sentence: Another noteworthy aspect of the ongoing discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that spending money on sports means boosing economy.
Error: boosing Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 410 350
No. of Characters: 2126 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.5 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.185 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.962 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 136 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 98 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 67 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.325 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.515 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.073 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5