Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society; those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
The developing of most communities causes to need more experts in specific majors than others. In fact, people believe that government should support the students financially only if they study in one of certain subjects. Although their claim has assets, it has downsides as well.
It is argued that the ministry grant for pupil who just wants to study in needed fields will has a great impact on the society. Indeed, more students will prefer to enroll to the current majors since they can get the funding from the government. Also, new cities would get much more benefits from its fresh graduates, who will keep their areas modern and vivid, than the importing specialists.
In contrast, the idea of spending the money of the authority only on students who enroll certain majors has negative impacts too. It is unjust for pupil who wants to complete in other fields specially students with high grades. Furthermore, they may not success in those needed areas since they could choose them only for the grant. Also, suburban and countryside might suffer from the shortage of skilled laborers as teachers.
In my opinion, government has to give her grant to any student who deserves the funding regardless to what kind of major he may choose. However, it can encourage students by offer them to attend free courses about currant areas, so they can feel more comfortable about selecting their studies.
All in all, despite the need of experts in some fields nowadays, government should not show any funding bias toward the pupil who attends to those subjects in the university.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-14 | lananhle301 | 89 | view |
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 80
- Dieting can change a person s life for the better or ruins one s health completely What is your opinion 58
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 82
- The graph below gives information on wages of some country over a ten year period. 80
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society; those who choose to study less relevant subjects sho 70
Comments
your introduction is not
your introduction is not clear that you are support or not for advantages outweigh the disadvantage.
Your structure of the essay can be more clear by following style
1, Introduction
2, Advantages
3, Disadvantages
4, Conclusion
All the best
Thank you Deva I relied on
Thank you Deva
I relied on this sentence as a thesis
"Although their claim has assets, it has downsides as well."
which means I believe their are negative sides from the claim.
for pupil who just wants to study in needed fields will has a great impact
for pupils who just want to study in needed fields will have a great impact
It is unjust for pupil who wants to complete in other fields
It is unjust for pupils who want to complete in other fields
they may not success in those needed areas
they may not succeed in those needed areas
it can encourage students by offer them
it can encourage students by offering them
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Sentence Length SD: 5.314 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 265 350
No. of Characters: 1280 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.035 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.83 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.342 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 92 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.385 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.314 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.344 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.614 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5