The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The maps demonstrate some changes, which are made due to the introduction of tourism, in an island.
It can be clearly seen that before transformations the place was bare apart from a few trees. However, after undergoing some changes, tourists are provided with some accommodations and facilities. As indicated, an area is allocated for swimming of the tourists off the beach. Also, some huts, which are equipped with some footpaths, are built in the west of the island to accommodate people. Besides, a restaurant, which is situated close to the sea, is sprung up. Furthermore, in the center of the island, a reception is erected, and it is accessible by taking advantage of some roadways which connect the reception to the restaurant and the sea. Moreover, some boats could dock at a pier which is constructed on the sea. In addition, in the east of the island, some huts with footpaths are sprung up in a circle.
In conclusion, comparing two maps discloses some dramatic changes in the island in terms of some facilities and accommodations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-02-09 | kevinzultaf | 78 | view |
2019-05-20 | Jasmineeee | 78 | view |
- Do good exam results at school or college guarantee success in life Discuss Do you believe that studying hard will bring a better life 74
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 58
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 70
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 58
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 176 200
No. of Characters: 839 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.642 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.767 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.907 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.064 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.431 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.552 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4