Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I disagree with the statement that we should change the leaders after every five years. First and foremost, in my perspective, Effective decision making is influenced. The governing party will discuss and formulate policies based on multiple discussion which consumes initial years of their tenure. When the policies are finally implemented, they are able to learn based on people's reactions and built better policies. If they are asked to step down before they learn from mistakes, they will not be given time to understand the system and build effective and fast decisions for next time.
Long term projects are affected as when the new people are elected, they stop the current running projects and will engage people in their planning. The current employees under the new manager may get confounded , as the new manager completely change the priorities of projects. This will make the hard work and time of employees in existing project unfruitful.
Reforms need time to build. Decision making is not only affected by leadership but with time. New direction to think come from experience and challenges faced. Novice leaders may take time to settle in new scenarios and understand the existing workflow and administration whether it be business, or education. If the company manager keeps on changing, it will be difficult for people to If the leaders who doesn’t satisfy the people, automatically will be asked to step down after 5 years.
It is definitely true to certain extent, that new leadership will bring new ideas. But maybe similar ideas may be tried by previous leaders and failed. Revitalization in a system will be brought by people who are susceptible to new technologies, ideologies, creative yet effective decisions. These are the traits which existing person in power might have, hence we should ask people to step down people, when the enterprise success is hindered by the ignorant leaders. So it would be unwise decision to change the leadership regularly. It may not necessarily be after every five years. The duration may be further increased, based on how good are current leaders are.
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 70
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...under the new manager may get confounded , as the new manager completely change th...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ployees in existing project unfruitful. Reforms need time to build. Decision mak...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging, it will be difficult for people to If the leaders who doesn’t satisfy the p...
^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ask people to step down people, when the enterprise success is hindered by the ig...
^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by the ignorant leaders. So it would be unwise decision to change the leadership...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229166666667 0.238963963785 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.197916666667 0.154291517835 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0833333333333 0.0886310499679 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0416666666667 0.0506014161523 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0416666666667 0.0449626384858 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0963541666667 0.123526278965 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0598958333333 0.0379742944744 158% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75958745666 2.82910677849 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03125 0.0316879551592 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00260416666667 0.0014075125626 185% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0677083333333 0.0950106342287 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0442708333333 0.0245489744465 180% => Try to use less modal verbs (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0208333333333 0.0157978311181 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2133.0 2899.98275862 74% => OK
No of words: 346.0 478.390804598 72% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16473988439 6.0591788892 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.65681771538 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378612716763 0.369966551584 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297687861272 0.285172536893 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21098265896 0.207245337619 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14450867052 0.136322040163 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75958745666 2.82910677849 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 234.298850575 78% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528901734104 0.492565540709 107% => OK
Word variations: 56.5359369031 56.8184620615 100% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 21.1264367816 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.3 23.7468607788 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5796758624 62.0618507366 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.65 143.81877709 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 23.7468607788 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.35 0.728815259664 48% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.87931034483 82% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.71264367816 65% => OK
Readability: 47.0687861272 52.2641144681 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.37037037037 1.64547068916 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282430231104 0.39480681544 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115398175773 0.11556216369 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0727302905143 0.0736162880345 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.455237187744 0.531340600358 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143894512623 0.15197228837 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100372743631 0.158818324754 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602475593283 0.0851127212816 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.352766571406 0.388921930462 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0783945099093 0.0677916285025 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20159811903 0.28015025965 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253657123907 0.0610219844235 42% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.8591954023 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30459770115 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.96264367816 101% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.10632183908 136% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.93390804598 102% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.04597701149 164% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 15.0862068966 133% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 4.25 Out of 6