There are many animal testing in the world today. Is animal testing necessary?
To what extent do you support? give your explanation.
In this contemporary time, myriad scientists use repeatedly million animals as a vivisection's object to search a new bio-medical medication for uncured diseases. However, numerous naturalists protest this sophisticated method concerning its sacrifice those organisms.
For hundred years throughout the human's history, animal testing was dominance medical healing treatment to millions sever patients who suffer for deadly diseases. The test in the animal body provides uncountable benefits: to investigate the matter of a biological disorder, to understand the characteristic of a virus, and to search a medical healing for condition. Because of it, numerous technophiles concur that medical experiment in animal is requisite need. They believe an animal such a desirable media to endeavor a complex method before employ it to the human because they could directly observe risks and effects of the newest experiment. For example, when a scientist found a new medication which is affect him to discover its impact. He would not usher to the individual because it might possibly unsafe medical care. Indeed, there are no alternative objects to substitute the laboratory's animal which is better than some animals because they have similar DNA characteristics with human. It is help to understand close-reaction experimental drug to the human.
Nevertheless, there are numerous opponents for the animal experimentation. A lot of them are an animal welfare who has cynical conviction to the purpose of animal testing because there are myriad facts which illustrated animal's discomfort. The beneficial pretext of animal research seems dubious. Apropos to Animal Care research, animals used in research and testing might experience pain from induced diseases, procedures, and toxicity. Those all could affect maximum detriment to the animals. Rat as a cancer drug for an example, most of them dead after perceived the injection because the researcher wants to understand the invisible effect in its organs.
To rebuff the statement, animal research adherent argue that the pain in testing could not relieved because it is not avoidable. They underline the animal used is helpful to cure the modern disease, and it is a deserving method.
To summarize, although animal research is involuntary protocol to search a new medication method. The researchers have to minimize the unpreventable pain to the laboratory's animal.
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things. This has made our lives generally more comfortable but many traditional values and customs have been lost and this is a pity.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 88
- Compare modern shopping centers to local markets and shops What way of shopping has more advantages for the people and the society 86
- In some large cities people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city centre in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city Give reasons in support and opposing this policy and give your own opinion 88
- Every year several local languages die out. Some people think that this not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree this opinion? 90
- Throughout the history, male leaders often made the society more violent and conflicting. If women governed the world, it would be a more peaceful world. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give an example to support your idea. 96
Sentence: For example, when a scientist found a new medication which is affect him to discover its impact.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to is and affect
Sentence: It is help to understand close-reaction experimental drug to the human.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to is and help
Sentence: A lot of them are an animal welfare who has cynical conviction to the purpose of animal testing because there are myriad facts which illustrated animal's discomfort.
Description: A WH-determiner is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to which and illustrated
Sentence: To rebuff the statement, animal research adherent argue that the pain in testing could not relieved because it is not avoidable.
Description: The fragment adherent argue that is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace argue with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
It is on top list:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 368 350
No. of Characters: 2008 1500
No. of Different Words: 203 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.38 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.457 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.01 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 175 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 133 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.372 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.15 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.517 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5