agree or disagree with this statement
television advertising directed toward toward young children should not be allowed
In this ever-changing world, public media play a significant role in peoples' life, they especially impress adolescent and children negatively or maybe positively depends on type of program. Considering the fact that television advertisements have financial purposes, their effects on children are never considered. Due to these facts, I personally believe that television’s advertisement should not direct toward young children. There are three main reasons why I have this preference.
First and foremost, because of the reason that children (aged two to five) are in sensitive age which learn and imitate everything they see immediately, the content of programs which are broadcast on television for them should be controlled especially psychologically. As an instance, I saw a cartoon when I was five years old that a honey bee lost its mother and always was bored and stressful in search of mother. The stress and concern of that honey bee was highly affected me in a way that now I remember it after twenty five years. Regarding this sensitivity, the advertisement should not addressed children because it could have impressed them in an irreparable way.
Another prominent reason is that, making decision by children in this age is more emotionally rather than logically, so, appealing advertisements on television absorb them and they desire to have it even if having this object will be harmful. For example there is an advertisement about learning alphabet’s' package on television in my country; although this kind of learning is not appropriate for this age, lots of parents buy it for their babies because of their insistence.
Last but not least, the advertisements which are shown on television, often are made in tricky way to absorb people to buy a product, even if they are not standardized or have poor quality which hurt consumer. Therefore, by addressing children but not parents, producers try to sell more and more. So, this is a kind of abusing which should be prevented by whom is responsible for.
To sum up, television advertisements should not be allowed to address children due to some reasons such as sensitivity of children, emotional based decisions, and deceptive purpose behind the advertisements.
- tpo1 76
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement:For success in a future job, the ability to relate people is more important than studying hard in school. 70
- do you agree or disagree with this statementthe extended family is now less important than it was in the past. 76
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and detail to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'address'
Suggestion: address
...nsitivity, the advertisement should not addressed children because it could have impresse...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an irreparable way" with adverb for "irreparable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...en because it could have impressed them in an irreparable way. Another prominent reason is that, ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'kind of', 'such as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214646464646 0.229887763892 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.169191919192 0.158761421928 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0707070707071 0.0866891130778 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0782828282828 0.046263068375 169% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0555555555556 0.0685040099705 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126262626263 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0530303030303 0.0351676179071 151% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.13353543931 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227272727273 0.0309702414327 73% => OK
Particles: 0.00252525252525 0.00188951952338 134% => OK
Determiners: 0.0707070707071 0.0887237588012 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176767676768 0.0209618222197 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0252525252525 0.0139019557991 182% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2236.0 2387.08602151 94% => OK
No of words: 358.0 408.028673835 88% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24581005587 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379888268156 0.338922669872 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293296089385 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22625698324 0.174417080927 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.173184357542 0.112833075102 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13353543931 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 64.3817669633 59.2087087015 109% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.5714285714 20.5533526081 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0521152608 48.84282405 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.714285714 120.699889404 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.5533526081 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.644075263715 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 54.90103751 45.7405998639 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.3 1.45489161554 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165647237804 0.300154397459 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104860398802 0.103427244359 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0742661250376 0.0752933317313 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.562732076754 0.497263757937 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174757698869 0.151897553556 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725784215148 0.114077575197 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568054338814 0.0781384742642 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.261013658298 0.336927656856 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0250624824674 0.067059652881 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111103677273 0.210909579961 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385046610123 0.0618886996521 62% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8870967742 34% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.