Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Government has a responsibility to manage a nation so the civilians can live prosperously. Some common issues that a government has to deal with, but not included to: economic, security, and transportation. In my opinion, government should focus both on solving immediate problems and the anticipated problems as well because the solution to current issue can cause another issue in the future.
For instance, let's take a look on a national problem that Indonesia has currently and how the government solve it. In Indonesia, poverty is a major issue that still has not been solved yet. One of the approach that the government used before was to give a subsidized fuel to the civilians. The purpose of this policy was to ease the economic burden of the low-income families since they have to pay less for transportation. Unfortunately, the subsidized fuel was discontinued after the new president was inaugurated. The first reason behind this discontinuation was because the subsidized fuel was enjoyed mostly by high-income citizen that owns personal transport, which totally contradict the expected purpose. Second, the cash that was used to subsidized the fuel can be used to build the nation itself, such as building port, dam, or maybe an airport. Port and airport are really important in Indonesia because Indonesia is an archipelago island, which means the only way to get between the island is through water or air. A better transportation can improve the economic development, thus increases the job opportunity and reduce the poverty. The solution of the new government is way better than the older one because the new solution will give a permanent effect (more job opportunities) rather than a temporary one (reduced fuel price).
In conclusion, problems on a nation is always related to one another. The future and the past. The government should never focus on the current problem and give the solution without thinking the side-effect of the solution itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 54
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
... give the solution without thinking the side-effect of the solution itself.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238636363636 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.153409090909 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0852272727273 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0539772727273 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0142045454545 0.0444667217837 32% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0994318181818 0.12292977631 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0284090909091 0.0406280797675 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00421416253 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0340909090909 0.030933414821 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.153409090909 0.0997080785238 154% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0198863636364 0.0249443105267 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0198863636364 0.0148568991511 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1972.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 320.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1625 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38125 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303125 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21875 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146875 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00421416253 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 219.290929204 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 57.4484097836 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5932784181 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 141.124799967 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.674092028746 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.3125 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.65384615385 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488413878119 0.391690518653 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138762516216 0.123202303941 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0794714991624 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.541248706762 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163994831613 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201191639869 0.161403998019 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114641468296 0.0892212321368 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.494270313453 0.385218514788 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0799910312611 0.0692045440612 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.393192331691 0.275328986314 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597771163729 0.0653680567796 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.