The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them , not by their contemporaries.
Do individual's greatness can be decided only by those who lives after them not by the one who are with them? Those individual with their aristocratic achievements were being aggrandize by the one who lives with them because they have seen their efforts their great works for the betterment of the society,so they can easily decide whether the individual have done something great or not.
There are several examples in which the achiever's greatness was decided by their contemporaries The Father of the India, Mahatma Gandhi fought for the independence by using non violence agenda inspires the fellow contemporaries to fought for the independence; after independence the people of the nation India named him Mahatma for their great contribution in India's independence. Einstein one of the great inventors also get praises by their contemporaries for his great achievements in the world of physics, he was also offered the president chair of Israel.
Not only the past inventors, philosophers got the praises but in today's world the persons likes Bill Gates also get praises by their contemporaries for inventing the window's operating systems and certain useful software that are helpful for the societies. Talking on the technocrats how can we forgot one of the most successful technocrats Steve Jobs the co founder of Apple.Incs every time he launches a new apple product people are eager to by that new product, he earned huge respect for his products.
There are several persons who got praised by those who live after them for example, Galileo,he proposed that the earth revolves around the sun not vice versa, but he faces many criticism but after several years that has been proved.
In final analysis, the individual who works hard for their great works and have benefited the societies a lot get praises by their contemporaries and the persons who live after them.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 50
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engagestudents in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. 58
- Law should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 16
- While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation." 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them , not by their contemporaries. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Do individuals greatness can be decided ...
^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
... works for the betterment of the society,so they can easily decide whether the indi...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al have done something great or not. There are several examples in which the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'achievers'' or 'achiever's'?
Suggestion: achievers'; achiever's
...There are several examples in which the achievers greatness was decided by their contempo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndependence by using non violence agenda inspires the fellow contemporaries to fo...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he societies. Talking on the technocrats how can we forgot one of the most succes...
^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Incs
...rats Steve Jobs the co founder of Apple.Incs every time he launches a new apple prod...
^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , he
...who live after them for example, Galileo,he proposed that the earth revolves around...
^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun criticism seems to be countable; consider using: 'many criticisms'.
Suggestion: many criticisms
...nd the sun not vice versa, but he faces many criticism but after several years that has been p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er several years that has been proved. In final analysis, the individual who w...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the persons who live after them.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'so', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266055045872 0.240241500013 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.152905198777 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0764525993884 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0366972477064 0.0497285424764 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0764525993884 0.0444667217837 172% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.14373088685 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.045871559633 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80613929906 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00611620795107 0.030933414821 20% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110091743119 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00917431192661 0.0249443105267 37% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0336391437309 0.0148568991511 226% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1903.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 307.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1986970684 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.325732899023 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263843648208 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169381107492 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133550488599 0.132149295362 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80613929906 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 52.6589481088 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6194690265 39% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 38.375 23.380412469 164% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4798630504 59.4972553346 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 237.875 141.124799967 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.375 23.380412469 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.21349557522 211% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 64.7593648208 51.4728631049 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.71264367816 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501293362391 0.391690518653 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.211345407498 0.123202303941 172% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0792668926663 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.827432490404 0.547984918172 151% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130430911602 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283835127951 0.161403998019 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147107659069 0.0892212321368 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.326951575449 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109895717596 0.0692045440612 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31321415956 0.275328986314 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105869841238 0.0653680567796 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.