the bar graph below shows the supermarket share of retail food sales for the years 1992 and 2002. Summarizes information by selecting in reporting main features and make comparisons if required.
Tthe horizontal bar graph compares the supermarket share of retail food sales in main 9 countries in autumn of 1992 and 2002 - within a gap of a decade - measured in numbers.
over the period as a whole, in the fall of 2002, an abrupt growth had observed in sales of all countries but South America South Africa and East Asia were at the pick.
In detail, for Central America and South America food sales were at 10 and 15 respectively, in 1992, but after a decade, in 2002, the food sales had surged by 350 % in both countries and ended at 35 and 55. For Southeast Asia number of sales in 1992 were same as that in Central Asia, but in 2002, sales were 5 less than that in Central America. Noticeably, in 2002 East Asia sales were at the highest point among all country sales - same as sales of South America and South Africa.
In the case of Central Europe and South Africa, food sales in 1992 were negligible but after a decade it - sales figures - rose steeply. In spite of this, South African sales were approximately 15 higher than that in Central Europe. At last, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and urban China did not contribute at all in food sale of 1992, but in 2002, food sales in China ended at significant numbers, nearby 50. Whereas Kenya and Zimbabwe were at the same level of sales in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-12 | darshilbhayani92 | 74 | view |
- nowadays University education is very expensive some people say that universities should reduce disease especially for less fortunate students of those coming from rural areas to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statements 84
- some experts say that it is better for children to Hindi learning a foreign language at primary school rather than Secondary School. do you think so and take advantages and disadvantages with your opinion. 73
- The traditional life style of local people in developing countries is attracting and increasing the number of tourists to the countries which has the effect of preventing local people changing to modern ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- hould museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 67
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...p of a decade - measured in numbers. over the period as a whole, in the fall of 2...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2002, the food sales had surged by 350 % in both countries and ended at 35 and 55...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., sales were 5 less than that in Central America. Noticeably, in 2002 East Asia s...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.313653136531 0.268076937826 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.0738007380074 0.116061578633 64% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0590405904059 0.0759168565197 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0184501845018 0.0366838410393 50% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00369003690037 0.0131127313244 28% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.19926199262 0.155750635184 128% => OK
Participles: 0.00738007380074 0.0379272487307 19% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.29784304057 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0210936926555 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0811808118081 0.0948980150116 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1301.0 1161.00487805 112% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.9 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33196721311 5.90752243213 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73763899035 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.229508196721 0.337110787985 68% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.16393442623 0.247514529752 66% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0860655737705 0.171178102325 50% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0532786885246 0.112407865282 47% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.29784304057 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459016393443 0.546246751206 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.4962475297 49.3433353143 84% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.1111111111 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7575988544 42.9750493124 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.555555556 135.714022679 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 43.5045537341 47.7609492067 91% => OK
Elegance: 5.42307692308 2.94281807926 184% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376875697667 0.418131533498 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.255226228878 0.181151798455 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0779132399255 0.0850326197045 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.763146818115 0.706616315825 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141450394204 0.157042692854 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230285320368 0.228904883108 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921192870131 0.108899403657 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.505233611919 0.367819155151 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.149203920385 0.0812612215331 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309679878445 0.316326947829 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588813998498 0.0921553760075 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...p of a decade - measured in numbers. over the period as a whole, in the fall of 2...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2002, the food sales had surged by 350 % in both countries and ended at 35 and 55...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., sales were 5 less than that in Central America. Noticeably, in 2002 East Asia s...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.313653136531 0.268076937826 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.0738007380074 0.116061578633 64% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0590405904059 0.0759168565197 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0184501845018 0.0366838410393 50% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00369003690037 0.0131127313244 28% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.19926199262 0.155750635184 128% => OK
Participles: 0.00738007380074 0.0379272487307 19% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.29784304057 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0210936926555 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0811808118081 0.0948980150116 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1301.0 1161.00487805 112% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.9 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33196721311 5.90752243213 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73763899035 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.229508196721 0.337110787985 68% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.16393442623 0.247514529752 66% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0860655737705 0.171178102325 50% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0532786885246 0.112407865282 47% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.29784304057 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459016393443 0.546246751206 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.4962475297 49.3433353143 84% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.1111111111 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7575988544 42.9750493124 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.555555556 135.714022679 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 43.5045537341 47.7609492067 91% => OK
Elegance: 5.42307692308 2.94281807926 184% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376875697667 0.418131533498 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.255226228878 0.181151798455 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0779132399255 0.0850326197045 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.763146818115 0.706616315825 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141450394204 0.157042692854 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230285320368 0.228904883108 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921192870131 0.108899403657 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.505233611919 0.367819155151 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.149203920385 0.0812612215331 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309679878445 0.316326947829 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588813998498 0.0921553760075 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.