Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author raises a controversial issue whether, to understand a society is it good enough just to study the character of people whom society believes to be a hero or its role model. Indisputably, there are many people who becomes the august personality for the society by their deeds and morals. Nevertheless, the society's character cannot be studied by such a meager sample. Thus, I disagree with the author that the scrutinizing the characters of the the role models gives the proper character of the society and would argue that the proper sample must be examined and the accurate data analysis must be done.
Firstly, there might be many people in the society who are righteous and who are very honest but than does society sees them as their heroes? Obviously, the answer is no as the views of the society differs about such an analysis. To illustrate it further let us take the example of Mahatma Gandhi. Many people consider him as a role model and believe in his ideals if the non-violence and truth. But, that does not give credit to the assumption that the society as a whole believes in the ideals of non-violence and truth. There are many occurences of the terror activities and scams which gives evidence about that.
Also, every person has a different thinking approach. Thus, it is evident that the role for different person might not be the same. Some people may choose Swami Vivekanand as his role model while some may choose Mahatma Gandhi, while some may choose Arjuna. Thus, the role model depends upon the vision of the person. So, the heroes being different for the people of the society, the characters of the people of the society will differ accordingly.
Though, it is true that the role model provides the ideal character of the person of the society; our comman sense tells us that there are many qualities which might be similar among all. For example, the impetus for the goal to achieve, etc. Nevertheless, it does not provides the precise character of the society as a whole. Further study of the same is required know that.
To sum it, the authors suggestion that the role models gives the character of the society as a whole is indefensible. The role model might describe the character of a person but not of society's. Thus, as long as some measurements are taken, or some cases are involved the conclusion that the role model does not describe the character of a society as a whole holds credit.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 54
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position 40
- Three years ago, because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve, 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve, an area that is home to most of the same species that are found in the western preserve, though in lar
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...that the scrutinizing the characters of the the role models gives the proper character ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...that the scrutinizing the characters of the the role models gives the proper character ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'see'?
Suggestion: see
...o are very honest but than does society sees them as their heroes? Obviously, the an...
^^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... their heroes? Obviously, the answer is no as the views of the society differs abo...
^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: provide
...achieve, etc. Nevertheless, it does not provides the precise character of the society as...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...achieve, etc. Nevertheless, it does not provides the precise character of the society as...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... is required know that. To sum it, the authors suggestion that the role models gives t...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247334754797 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.140724946695 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0575692963753 0.0880659088768 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046908315565 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0362473347548 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121535181237 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0170575692964 0.0406280797675 42% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.53213642581 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0149253731343 0.030933414821 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.159914712154 0.0997080785238 160% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0255863539446 0.0249443105267 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0170575692964 0.0148568991511 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2434.0 2732.02544248 89% => OK
No of words: 425.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72705882353 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322352941176 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225882352941 0.280924506359 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141176470588 0.200843997647 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0894117647059 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53213642581 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432941176471 0.48968727796 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.7134948318 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3181818182 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1442681389 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.636363636 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.674092028746 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 41.9064171123 51.4728631049 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.72380952381 1.64882698954 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.62294090586 0.391690518653 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128285985398 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100832991205 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.580370779945 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164533836555 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275654274404 0.161403998019 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135317149533 0.0892212321368 152% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.549770098785 0.385218514788 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0790972593268 0.0692045440612 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.476160780505 0.275328986314 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561117351811 0.0653680567796 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.70907079646 369% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.