Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is considered to be one of the most potent tool that underpins the lives of the majority of homo sapiens in this world. With tremendous amount of research going into various fields of study and a plethora of options glimmering in front of student’s eyes, a student is bound to be at the most important crossroad of his life. Thus before making any life changing decision it is very much essential to seek out an expert’s advice or view things from a more experienced person’s perspective. However this in no way implies that an educational institution holds the responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Consider a hypothetical but a very realistic situation: Suppose a student who is highly proficient in high school mathematics but is not so adept in English literature aspires to become a writer because he is passionate about the subject. For all his zeal and keenness, it would be a devastating setback for him/her if the faculty at the institution try to deter his ambitions of becoming a writer. After all it would belie the old adage “An expert in anything was always once a beginner”.
Notwithstanding that educational institutions do have a role in carving out a student’s future, but a role that is certainly sanguine rather than dissuading the students. A role that encourages the student to meet his dreams, a role that though highlights the flaws involved regarding the student persuading that academic field of study but at the same time an institution needs to put in efforts in helping a student overcome its shortcoming.
Additionally, the term success is very subjective. One may measure success in terms of remuneration, for other it would be completing a post-graduation degree. There’s no one fixed definition of success. Success is never final and failure is not fatal. Nobody knows what would happen next, thus it would not justify for an educational institution to predict whether the student is likely to succeed in a particular field or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- TOEFL Integrated: Altruism:Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, being sure to specifically explain how they cast doubt on points made in the reading 86
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people enjoy life more than old people do?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e most important crossroad of his life. Thus before making any life changing decisio...
^^^^
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... experienced person's perspective. However this in no way implies that an educatio...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'after all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246153846154 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.151282051282 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0846153846154 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0538461538462 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0307692307692 0.0444667217837 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123076923077 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0435897435897 0.0406280797675 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.18781177417 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0282051282051 0.030933414821 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00512820512821 0.0016655270985 308% => OK
Determiners: 0.117948717949 0.0997080785238 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0153846153846 0.0249443105267 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0153846153846 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2089.0 2732.02544248 76% => OK
No of words: 342.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1081871345 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368421052632 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30701754386 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207602339181 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149122807018 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18781177417 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 66.3330507083 55.4138127331 120% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4285714286 23.380412469 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7587256223 59.4972553346 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.214285714 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 23.380412469 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 55.1303258145 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.75 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364260781887 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121036257615 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0850635522917 0.077325440228 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.54461925022 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149223679676 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140786776116 0.161403998019 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123955955545 0.0892212321368 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.246744805587 0.385218514788 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0609515562719 0.0692045440612 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232649253992 0.275328986314 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981552388371 0.0653680567796 150% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.