To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author raises controversial issue that a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards to be an effective leader. Here, the author tries to convince with visually contradict statement. However, a public official should not maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. He should intract with public without any ethical or moral standards.
First of all, a public official must maintain lower ethical and moral standards. Because of this, he can intract with public more efficiently and can gain their trust towards him. For example, one public official who has the highest ethical and moral standards cannot listen to the problems of the public and makes his own decision. This decision might bring injustice to the public. Thus, officers loose public's faith towards him.
Furthermore, one effective leader is a person who puts his ego side and listen to the public regarding their problem. The public official who has high moral and ethical standards can believe himself supirior to others. He always tries to ignore person who is not at his moral or ethical standards. Because of this, he might be biased towards famous or rich personalities. Hence, this reduces faith of public in government. Moreover, it is harmful for country and for governing official.
Although, the public official should have to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards at some point of their decision. Judges should have to be firm in their decision. So, they cannot be moved by emotion arguments by culprit. This might helpful for society and country to make country crime free. Hence, we can say that in judgment process this claim must be applied.
In conclusion, I just want to cite that a public official should maintain the highest ethical and moral standards but only in judgment processes. Because of this relationship between the public and public official improves. Moreover, this can also help to make better country for the people of country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | NobodyUp | 79 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | roy.suro | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | seonjungkim | 62 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | gaurang.rane | 33 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 54
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter country for the people of country.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.191135734072 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.124653739612 0.157235817809 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.146814404432 0.0880659088768 167% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0498614958449 0.0444667217837 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0969529085873 0.12292977631 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0138504155125 0.0406280797675 34% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.52664299921 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332409972299 0.030933414821 107% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0858725761773 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0498614958449 0.0249443105267 200% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.01108033241 0.0148568991511 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1976.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 321.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.15576323988 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.429906542056 0.366273622748 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311526479751 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18691588785 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102803738318 0.132149295362 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52664299921 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 219.290929204 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451713395639 0.48968727796 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.7379028147 55.4138127331 81% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.9565217391 23.380412469 60% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9838057585 59.4972553346 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9130434783 141.124799967 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9565217391 23.380412469 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.674092028746 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 45.1091697142 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.32926829268 1.64882698954 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472152059426 0.391690518653 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115502399786 0.123202303941 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.091601524167 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.472334663316 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140656080157 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174751904362 0.161403998019 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116015435302 0.0892212321368 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.419261421513 0.385218514788 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0703936808084 0.0692045440612 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343922684837 0.275328986314 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588015964234 0.0653680567796 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.