As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In the era of smartphones, tablets and other popular devices with keyboards and touchscreens that surround us on each step, one could easily get an impression that our ability to think for ourselves is rapidly detoriarating. If we want to subtract two numbers, we use our smartphones. If we want to think of a way to spend a pleasant weekend with our loved ones, we ask Google for advice. But stating that we will soon stop using our own brains would be an exaggeration.
Firstly, we use technology mostly for simple everyday tasks that would take too much of our prescious time if we did them ourselves. That leaves us much more time for other, not so trivial problems. Secondly, technology did not only open a whole new dimension of ideas, but it also created previously unexisting professions such as programmers. Thirdly, use of technology motivated human thinking so much, that in the previous 20 years we had hundreds of important discoveries that people living in the 19th century never even dreamt of.
Imagine working as a small business owner, where you encounter simple math problems in accounting on a daily basis. If you could not use devices such as calculators, you would have to spend hours and hours solving equations every day, which would leave you less time for other more complicated problems such as coming up with ways of making the business more frugal.
In addition to this, had computers never been invented, we would not have new proffesions such as programmers, IT experts and robotics engeneers. It is hard to imagine a modern world without pioneers of techonogy such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, who showed that they can not only think for themselves, but can also come up with brilliant inventions such as Windows and Apple.
Moreover, the use of technology has motivated scientists and inventors so much in the last 20 years. When humans invented the wheel, they could not imagine that today we will have amphibious vehicals that can funcion on dry land as well as the sea or cars that drive themselves. One could argue that people will soon become lazier than ever and let smart devices do everything for them – it is enough to press few buttons, relax and let the car drive itself. But the truth is these dramatic changes have not prevented us from using our brains. They have only lighten the fuse that led up to explosion of new ideas, propositions and solutions.
Considering everything said, the statement that technology will weaken our ability to think for ourselves is rifed with holes and as such can be rebutted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton. 63
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 75
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 34
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 560, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lightened'.
Suggestion: lightened
...s from using our brains. They have only lighten the fuse that led up to explosion of ne...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211618257261 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.159751037344 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.097510373444 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0726141078838 0.0497285424764 146% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0788381742739 0.0444667217837 177% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.116182572614 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0414937759336 0.0406280797675 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63880309235 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207468879668 0.030933414821 67% => OK
Particles: 0.00622406639004 0.0016655270985 374% => OK
Determiners: 0.051867219917 0.0997080785238 52% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0352697095436 0.0249443105267 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0207468879668 0.0148568991511 140% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2568.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 441.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8231292517 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.299319727891 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235827664399 0.280924506359 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172335600907 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124716553288 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63880309235 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 63.109090534 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.5 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5919987365 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.666666667 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.674092028746 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 48.0827664399 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.18666666667 1.64882698954 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355230087469 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108194479777 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0727338063728 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.570731123665 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167559254177 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122417617954 0.161403998019 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601706218992 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.230601949504 0.385218514788 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0381291585898 0.0692045440612 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206667667298 0.275328986314 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311989393221 0.0653680567796 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.