tpo28
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the argument that did actually the Peary reach the North Pole or not. While the reading part lists some reasons as the possible adherences for the validity of this event, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the passage.
First, the article mentions to the conclusion of National Geographic Society committee based on the Peary's investigation records, which supports this event. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this conclusion. As she asserts the survey and its conclusion are biased and invalid. First of all, the committee was the best friend of Peary who financially supports the Peary's investigations. In addition, the survey was conducted solo in two days which is an insufficient amount of time for doing a careful examination.
Next, meanwhile, the text refers to the Avery's trek, which in the less than 37 days he sleds to the North Pole, as one of the feasibilities of this incident. On the contrary, the professor challenges this reference. As she states the conditions on these two treks differ from each other; inasmuch as the Avery sledded with less weight because his foods are carried by an airplane. In addition, the weather condition in the Avery's trip was so favorable condition which helped the Avery to trek in the less than 37 days. In the contrast, the Peary carried his foods by himself, and weather condition was harsh.
Last, the passage posits to the shadow of a photograph as an evidence of the Peary's travel. Nonetheless, the lecturer refutes the validity of this picture. Based on her assertion, the measurement of the shadow for identifying the location requires a very precisely examination. Besides, this photo is edited during these 100 years. As a result, the photo is too fussy and the shadow is blurred which unable the precise examination of the picture. Thus, information conducted by the shadow of the picture is inaccurate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-25 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | zizi.dream | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | crystal80314 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | DAISY CHANG | 71 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | ememari | 75 | view |
- tpo33-integrated writing 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teacher or supervisors. 73
- 1.Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the positi 66
- 1 In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers' salaries. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'besides', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274666666667 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.114666666667 0.158904122519 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0586666666667 0.0723426182421 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.032 0.0435111971325 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0213333333333 0.0277247811725 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.032 0.0370669169778 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75701923195 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016 0.0208969081088 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.186666666667 0.128158765124 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186666666667 0.0114777025283 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2028.0 1645.83664459 123% => OK
No of words: 336.0 271.125827815 124% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03571428571 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363095238095 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270833333333 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214285714286 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127976190476 0.113142543107 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75701923195 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 56.1202590717 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6666666667 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2653357138 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.878197800319 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 45.75 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.63492063492 1.90840788429 138% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.664706322228 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140127020884 0.142949733639 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0911732230139 0.0787303798458 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.629046849278 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158891860377 0.139662658121 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.322501802516 0.266732575781 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117701895054 0.103435571967 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.528120325362 0.414875509568 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0140883800167 0.0530846634433 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.528198664153 0.40443939384 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606538868998 0.0528353158467 115% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.