A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
At first glance, more uniformity in education thorughout a nation might seem like the ideal situation since all individuals would be at par with each other (at least in terms of exposure) till the time they get into a college. However, on a deeper examination, this scenario seems not only a non-pragamatic one, but also a one that might hamper a nation's intellectual diversity. Hence, the recommendation might be effective.
To bolster the claim above, let us consider a scenario in which a nation has implemented the rule where all students need to study the same curriculum before they enter into college. This is likely to result in all students being competent in one or few specific areas by the time they enter college. Also, since students are likely to pick a course in college which is best suited to their interests and competencies, and since a person's interests and competencies are directly dependent upon the exposure that he or she receives, it is likely that even at the college level, all the nation's intellect would be accummulated in a few specific areas- the ones that were included as a part of the school curriculum. This is clearly not an ideal scenario as one would expect the nation to be competent in all domains to encourage intellectual growth and diversity.
One might argue that merely having the same curriculum across nation might not lead to the lack of intellectual growth and diversity in a nation as explained above since education is a really subjective matter. Same content can be interpreted in many different ways and highly dependent upon a person's interest as well as the way it is taught. Moreover, students studying the same curriculum in school, can exit into different fields by the time they enter college and hence the above claim stands invalidated. However, my argument to counter this would be that even though the same content can be interpreted and taught in different ways, the range of these interpretations and this intellectual diversity would still be confined when juxtaposed to not confining the curriculum at all.
Moreover, I feel it will also against individual interests to restrict them at school level as that is the time to explore and develop your interests. Not having a choice between differently designed curriculums is serious threat to over all personality development recommendation is also an impractical one since different parts of the nation might not have access to similar resources.
Having said that, I think restricting and homogenizing the curriculum at school level could lead to serious hampering of intellectual diversity in a nation and hence would not support the recommendation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-26 | Sidharth_7 | 50 | view |
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 85
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 60
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...c one, but also a one that might hamper a nations intellectual diversity. Hence, the reco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 586, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...that even at the college level, all the nations intellect would be accummulated in a fe...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ter. Same content can be interpreted in many different ways and highly dependent upon a person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'at least', 'i feel', 'i think', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216560509554 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.157112526539 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0849256900212 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0636942675159 0.0497285424764 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0339702760085 0.0444667217837 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129511677282 0.12292977631 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0467091295117 0.0406280797675 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96436328303 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.031847133758 0.030933414821 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125265392781 0.0997080785238 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.036093418259 0.0249443105267 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127388535032 0.0148568991511 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2679.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07482993197 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356009070295 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265306122449 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208616780045 0.200843997647 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151927437642 0.132149295362 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96436328303 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 52.0069285686 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 31.5 23.380412469 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.7523968455 59.4972553346 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.357142857 141.124799967 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 23.380412469 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07142857143 0.674092028746 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 58.0306122449 51.4728631049 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.54166666667 1.64882698954 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317507242779 0.391690518653 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152581949548 0.123202303941 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0876937134564 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.637871808466 0.547984918172 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151219038709 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152140435711 0.161403998019 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951505046993 0.0892212321368 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356694460724 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.119402073007 0.0692045440612 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201437452694 0.275328986314 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846561678922 0.0653680567796 130% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.