Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Sometimes we find a gem in the unlikeliest of places. The purpose of an educational institute is to provide us with the right tools to find that unique gem inside us and make it shine. Thus I don't agree with the authors' statement that educational institutes should control the fields of our study.
An educational institution is the one of the formal places where people go to study and learn about various fields and they develop multiple talents. Its the responsibility of these formal institutes to provide the apt infrastructure and learning environment, conducive for learning. Every person is unique and there are many hidden talents that the world may not know about them due to various reasons. Someone might be a closet singer, another can compose beautiful poetry.
Instead judging superficially by the grades and daily interactions seems. By dissuading students from not taking part into certain fields might result in hampering in the students future career. Thomas Alva Edison was thrown out of school, after his teachers called him mentally ill and addled. Sadly no one in his school could diagnose that he suffered from dyslexia. It was his mother who was determined to educate him and imparted him the knowledge, resulting him becoming who he was.
Inventor of the light bulb. Instead had his teachers listened and understood his way of thinking and provided him with appropriate platform to conceive those ideas, his success could have been credited to them. Rather they demeaned and humiliated him. Providing the appropriate platforms and environment for people to come forth with their talents is very important. Rather than dissuading students from pursuing certain fields, schools should provide extra effort and time into students they perceive as 'weak' or are unlikely to succeed in them. Chances are they are providing the knowledge and skill to the next Steve Jobs or Thomas Alva Edison and would be pleasantly surprised at their success.
Thus if educational institutions truly want their students to succeed, they should provide with the best of infrastructure and education and believe in them. Then their job is fully done.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...unique gem inside us and make it shine. Thus I dont agree with the authors statement...
^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gem inside us and make it shine. Thus I dont agree with the authors statement that e...
^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ke it shine. Thus I dont agree with the authors statement that educational institutes s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...elds and they develop multiple talents. Its the responsibility of these formal inst...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...another can compose beautiful poetry. Instead judging superficially by the grades and...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...o he was. Inventor of the light bulb. Instead had his teachers listened and understoo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ccess could have been credited to them. Rather they demeaned and humiliated him. Provi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...easantly surprised at their success. Thus if educational institutions truly want ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225464190981 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.185676392573 0.157235817809 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0822281167109 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0397877984085 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0928381962865 0.0444667217837 209% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.106100795756 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0424403183024 0.0406280797675 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69783889324 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0318302387268 0.030933414821 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0742705570292 0.0997080785238 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.026525198939 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0079575596817 0.0148568991511 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2166.0 2732.02544248 79% => OK
No of words: 350.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18857142857 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397142857143 0.366273622748 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294285714286 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.117142857143 0.132149295362 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69783889324 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591428571429 0.48968727796 121% => OK
Word variations: 68.2230090722 55.4138127331 123% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5 23.380412469 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2521822678 59.4972553346 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.380412469 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 0.674092028746 37% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 46.9285714286 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.175 1.64882698954 71% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299678384646 0.391690518653 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0819281741286 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0647507658973 0.077325440228 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489110004496 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166618907562 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968666837434 0.161403998019 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811586303778 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291419818235 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0744992426606 0.0692045440612 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185313846953 0.275328986314 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489101640023 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.