It has recently been suggested that the classical, or “dead”, languages Greek and Latin should be re-introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting job. Those in favour of the idea say that education is more about training the mind than preparing for a career.
Which of these points of view do you most agree with? Support your argument, where possible, with reason and/ or examples from your own experience and observations.
These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about “Dead ancient languages Like Greek and Latin should be reintroduced in school curriculum or not”. While it is possible to claim that ancient languages are not at all useful for future generation. My view is that disadvantages outweigh the advantages. I totally disagree to reintroduce and in this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why reintroducing of ancient languages into school syllabus is considered as disadvantageous to the society. One of them is, according to the modern world languages like Greek and Latin are not at all useful for study purpose. Just students get to know about the value of language but can’t implement practically to communicate and to learn something. It can be argued that education is more about training mind than preparing for a career. While every student wants to achieve his goal so, what is the use if they are teaching which is of no use in this practical world!
Those who argue for not re-introducing in school syllabus are actually a good thing. Firstly it is claimed that at present, in this developed world students should be well educated with a common language which can be used as a source of learning, achieving something, communicate with others. Then, there are concerns about the people who are forcing to reintroduce which is already a dead language.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal view is that, reintroducing ancient language is no use but by reintroducing a common language can help the students to survive, very helpful to achieve job and can easily communicate with other states or countries as they already use English as a common language.
- It has recently been suggested that the classical or dead languages Greek and Latin should be re introduced into the school curriculum Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting job Those in 69
- Age discrimination occurs when a decisionis made on the basis of a person's age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older 56
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job? Do you agree or disagree". 84
- "Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of h 56
- Many people around the world are choosing to move to live in cities What problems do people experience in big cities Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns 38
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reintroducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reintroducing
...ncerns about the people who are forcing to reintroduce which is already a dead language. Whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216216216216 0.247107183377 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.183183183183 0.155533422707 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0720720720721 0.0946595960268 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048048048048 0.0501214627716 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.036036036036 0.0437548338989 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138138138138 0.122226691241 113% => OK
Participles: 0.045045045045 0.0403226058552 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87582247674 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.033033033033 0.0326793684256 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0930930930931 0.0861772015684 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.024024024024 0.021408717616 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.021021021021 0.011925033212 176% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1794.0 1933.35771543 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 316.048096192 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357859531773 0.374742101984 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280936454849 0.28420135186 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207357859532 0.203846283523 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133779264214 0.137316102897 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87582247674 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.037074148 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535117056856 0.56093040696 95% => OK
Word variations: 54.7704497354 60.7387585426 90% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5571501759 49.517814964 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 127.492653851 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.814263465372 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 51.0936454849 49.1944974215 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.49438202247 1.69124875643 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367499784886 0.332605444948 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0930469249439 0.102741220458 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0512381261579 0.0668466124924 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524850145249 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159213140929 0.148594505496 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150039183899 0.134430193775 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475824972371 0.0742795772207 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.341506758611 0.324371583561 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.06795068778 0.0638462369009 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253419025241 0.228012699653 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731034705783 0.058150111329 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.