tpo 11
The reading claims that nowadays, people pay less heed to literature and this has a detrimental effect on the future of literature itself. However, the lecturer casts doubts on this ideas and provides some points to refute them all.
First the author argues that by reading less literature people lose lots of benefits. In contrast, the lecture casts doubt on this idea by stating that although people read less literature, they read lots of other books which help them to boost their imagination. These prominent books can paves people`s way to broaden their perspective and improve their knowledge too, and it is unfair to say that just literature books can do such a things.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that instead of reading books people squander their time on watching television programs and listening to the different kinds of music. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that such programs are beneficial way for exchanging cultures and expressing different ideas. Therefore, it is fallacious conclusion to consider them as an ineffective cultural means.
Finally, the reading asserts that reading less amount of literature is occurred at the time when the best literature books is being published. On the contrary, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that people support these kinds of books less and less, just because of the authors` faults. She states that these books are really hard for people to read, and as a result, they pay less attention to these kinds of books and prefer to spend their time on the other subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | meet96300 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | Alana Gerber | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | khatuntajkera | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Pooja dave | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
.... However, the lecturer casts doubts on this ideas and provides some points to refut...
^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a thing' or simply 'things'?
Suggestion: a thing; things
... that just literature books can do such a things. Furthermore, the reading passage hold...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
...onsider them as an ineffective cultural means. Finally, the reading asserts that rea...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254295532646 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.168384879725 0.158904122519 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0790378006873 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0412371134021 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0481099656357 0.0277247811725 174% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113402061856 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0412371134021 0.0370669169778 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64822146413 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0378006872852 0.0208969081088 181% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113402061856 0.128158765124 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00687285223368 0.0158828679856 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00687285223368 0.0114777025283 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1592.0 1645.83664459 97% => OK
No of words: 260.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12307692308 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.353846153846 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269230769231 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196153846154 0.187439937562 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138461538462 0.113142543107 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64822146413 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 50.4451719244 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6363636364 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6040704672 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.727272727 132.220823453 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.878197800319 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 50.5594405594 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.58666666667 1.90840788429 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.638888956556 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137481670444 0.142949733639 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.085103457631 0.0787303798458 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.629041731732 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13451355445 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.308230715137 0.266732575781 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138067673613 0.103435571967 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368909643538 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0796598924428 0.0530846634433 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.465233135144 0.40443939384 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795703017214 0.0528353158467 151% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.