The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.
The author concludes that illegal immigrants must be removed from the country and must be returned to their own countries. The author states that these illegal immigrants pose a threat to the nation's economy as well as its identity. He makes certain assumptions like every illegal immigrant would pose such threat and thus such assumptions must be answered before a decision can be made.
Firstly, the author assumes that the nation's autonomy is based on the strength of its borders, although it could be true in some aspects but not widely true. The author does not take into account the countries that are part of the EU. Countries in the EU allow their citizens go from one country to another without any limitations imposed, this has allowed the countries with dense populations to go and work in countries with scarce population needing work force. If the sovereinity of the nation remains intact even with the influx of these immigrants, the authors claim that they tarnish the national identity prove false.
Furthermore, the author assumes that the illegal immigrants would be the reason for the economy to be endangered. It could very well be possible that the country's current population is incapable of maintaining the country's economy stable. It could be possible that the literacy rate of the country is very low and rather these illegal immigrants are helping the country's economy. Many illegal immigrants could be coming in from a neighboring country, this neighboring country with every possibility could be very developed thus the trained populace of that country might find getting jobs difficult over there, with the untrained populace of the author's country they could be finding better jobs thus boosting the country's economy. These immigrants could be setting up their own businesses in this country and providing employment to the native population. If such is the case, these immigrants rather than being bane to the country as the author assumes are proving to be a boon. If the argument stated above proves to be right and the country decides on returning these trained individuals to their home countries, the author's country would be damaging their own economy.
Finally, the author assumes that these illegal immigrants coming into their country are coming in by their own will. It could very well also be a possibility that their home country could be part of a war, that living there is no longer possible because of frequent bombings and that there is a necessity for them to cross the border into another country in order to protect their children and family. If such is the case, then sending them back to their own countries would rather be commensurate to sending them back in their death beds. The author's wordings suggest that the country is good enough to self sustain and they could provide refuge to such immigrants coming in while the war runs its due course. Yes, this could have a negative effect on their economy, since these individuals would require food, shelter. But this could turn out to be a boon for author's country being provided with a surge of an additional work force. Even if the author does not believe in providing the individuals with jobs at the higher levels, these individuals could be of great help in daily tasks requiring labor. If the argument stated above proves to be right then, the author's concern for the nation's economy and national identity could very well be diminished. These refugee's could be provided with food in return of certain amount of work being done.
Hence, I do believe what the author is trying to do is a potentially good idea. But the authors argument consists of many loopholes and without more evidence, more information we cannot conclude that this is the best way to go forward.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-21 | nikki1610 | 63 | view |
2019-11-27 | Mat Pro | 69 | view |
2019-11-12 | bishal sitaula | 59 | view |
2019-11-09 | Roshan Dhakal | 59 | view |
2019-10-06 | man_si_jain | 72 | view |
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 50
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch,having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years,has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of bookson all subjects. Clearly, opening the c 70
- The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effor 75
- “Of the two leading real estate firms in our town-Adams Realty and Fitch Realty- Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams revenue last year was twice 83
- The rating system for electronic games is similar to the movie rating system in that it provides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic game rating system is not work 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...illegal immigrants pose a threat to the nations economy as well as its identity. He mak...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nswered before a decision can be made. Firstly, the author assumes that the nat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... Firstly, the author assumes that the nations autonomy is based on the strength of it...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ish the national identity prove false. Furthermore, the author assumes that the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y would be damaging their own economy. Finally, the author assumes that these i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...right then, the authors concern for the nations economy and national identity could ver...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of certain amount of work being done. Hence, I do believe what the author is t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... do is a potentially good idea. But the authors argument consists of many loopholes and...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229074889868 0.25644967241 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.168869309838 0.15541462614 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0910425844347 0.0836205057962 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528634361233 0.0520304965353 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0411160058737 0.0272364105082 151% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12187958884 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0543318649046 0.0416121511921 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50088538967 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0293685756241 0.026700313972 110% => OK
Particles: 0.00293685756241 0.001811407834 162% => OK
Determiners: 0.129221732746 0.113004496875 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0396475770925 0.0255425247493 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00293685756241 0.0127820249294 23% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3809.0 2731.13054187 139% => OK
No of words: 636.0 446.07635468 143% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98899371069 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02185627292 4.57801047555 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361635220126 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284591194969 0.287650121315 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163522012579 0.208842608468 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0896226415094 0.135150697306 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50088538967 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 207.018472906 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407232704403 0.469332199767 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.5410490404 52.1807786196 95% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.039408867 125% => OK
Sentence length: 25.44 23.2022227129 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6034190455 57.7814097925 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.36 141.986410481 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.44 23.2022227129 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.724660767414 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 53.8991194969 51.9672348444 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.54189944134 1.8405768891 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480845255229 0.441005458295 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14311221735 0.135418324435 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0958066736019 0.0829849096947 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.569938688867 0.58762219726 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126026730371 0.147661913831 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201958892654 0.193483328276 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888281198882 0.0970749176394 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.472921371315 0.42659136922 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.183685411343 0.0774707102158 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328641721217 0.312017818177 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872633481178 0.0698173142475 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.87684729064 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 13.0 5.36822660099 242% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 14.657635468 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.