Dinosaurs
The professor explains that R. robustus is probably an active hunter of dinosaurs. The information she presents directly contrasts the facts outlined in the reading passage. The reading shows that the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur.
First of all, the speaker mentions that although this mammal is small in term of size, it doesn't necessarily mean that it would not be able to hunt psittocosaurs or similar dinosaurs. She says that in order to be capable in hunting dinosaurs, the size of the hunter is at least two times bigger than its prey. In such a case, it is possible for R. robustus that has twice the mass of baby psittocosaurs. On the other hand, according to the reading, R. robustus would have been capable to hunt psittocosaurs since R. robustus was not big enough to catch its prey.
Second, the professor maintains that in corresponding to Tazmanian devil having similar length and position of legs, R. robustus might be also run as fast as 15 km per hour. With this speed, it's possible for R. robustus to chasing after its prey. Nonetheless, the reading includes the information that the small legs of R. Robustus, however, tend to be more suited for scavenging and its legs are also positioned to somewhat to the side, thereby making it difficult to catch psittocosaurs easily.
Last but least, she points out that R. robustus has a powerful jobs, thus facilitating this animal to swallow its animal without leaving any teeth mark on its prey's bones. In addition, she believes that R. robustus used its back teeth in swallowing its prey in big pieces. However, the reading specifies that the dinosaur bones inside the R. robustus' stomach contains no teeth mark and claims that this dinosaur probably swallowed an egg found in an unguarded dinosaur nest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-02 | alpesh | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | silvio deusdara | 3 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | alexdesouza1907 | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | silvio deusdara | 3 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | diegof1390 | 75 | view |
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe 48
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 50
- Smart cars 86
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... facts outlined in the reading passage. The reading shows that the mammals stomach ...
^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...his mammal is small in term of size, it doesnt necessarily mean that it would not be a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'job'?
Suggestion: job
...nts out that R. robustus has a powerful jobs, thus facilitating this animal to swall...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'at least', 'in addition', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27380952381 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.14880952381 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.077380952381 0.0723426182421 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0595238095238 0.0435111971325 137% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0505952380952 0.0277247811725 182% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127976190476 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0386904761905 0.0370669169778 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70935333566 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0357142857143 0.0208969081088 171% => OK
Particles: 0.00297619047619 0.00154638098197 192% => OK
Determiners: 0.0982142857143 0.128158765124 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00892857142857 0.0158828679856 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00595238095238 0.0114777025283 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1812.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 306.0 271.125827815 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92156862745 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339869281046 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277777777778 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205882352941 0.187439937562 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101307189542 0.113142543107 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70935333566 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.3770964235 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5384615385 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2297687767 49.3711431718 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 51.3162393162 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.70114942529 1.90840788429 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554739049889 0.549887131256 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121048186727 0.142949733639 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0569932930956 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615025804678 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102943954317 0.139662658121 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353228953319 0.266732575781 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673873895057 0.103435571967 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371679975681 0.414875509568 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0750632303064 0.0530846634433 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429519021228 0.40443939384 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434165292251 0.0528353158467 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.