People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I agree with the proposition since the rational train of thought requires one to make inferences and conclusions from what is logically true rather than getting tempted by their emotions to make decisions. The main issue over here is making decisions based on emotions since that dictates the choice and ultimately the fact that it was correct or not. The justification of that choice with logic is a mere consequence of the correctness of the choice.
Emotions and sentiments are perceptions of the external living beings and non-living things in ones mind and tend to change often depending upon the situations in which the individual in question confronts or observes them. Since these confrontations and observations might not capture all of the actions and reactions of the concerned externality, emotions are essentially tantamount to the partial knowledge about it. Hence, it would be unsurprising if sentimental decision makers fare poorly in their choices.
However, the spontaneity and urgentness of the situation may require the decision maker to act hastily and the situation may not also allow one to consider all the possibilities about the consequences of the decision. In such a case, the validity of the decision hinges upon whether the partial knowledge which the decision maker possessed is pertinent to the case in hand. A situation which has already been seen by the decision maker in the past would naturally cause them to act in a knowledgable way. In this way, the decisions based on emotions might turn out to be correct.
But for decisions which more time, the decision maker needs to be cautious and think thoroughly since the variables and stakeholders involved also have the scope of changing their response. It is questionable whether one should use the partial knowledge they have or rather decide as if they know nothing. It would be largely dependent on the nature of the decision maker, whichever of the above two choices they make and go ahead with their decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 83
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... living beings and non-living things in ones mind and tend to change often depending...
^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ions and observations might not capture all of the actions and reactions of the concerned ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234957020057 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.143266475645 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0659025787966 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0601719197708 0.0497285424764 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0429799426934 0.0444667217837 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137535816619 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0286532951289 0.0406280797675 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86334772147 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0286532951289 0.030933414821 93% => OK
Particles: 0.00286532951289 0.0016655270985 172% => OK
Determiners: 0.12893982808 0.0997080785238 129% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0229226361032 0.0249443105267 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0143266475645 0.0148568991511 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2005.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 329.0 452.878318584 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09422492401 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340425531915 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288753799392 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237082066869 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155015197568 0.132149295362 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86334772147 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54103343465 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 57.5387792745 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 25.3076923077 23.380412469 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8306925303 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.230769231 141.124799967 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 23.380412469 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.538461538462 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 54.1830722469 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.62790697674 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419498978919 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149428327381 0.123202303941 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0874607572923 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.641404293763 0.547984918172 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147092200162 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204011777713 0.161403998019 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711212616797 0.0892212321368 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.459136703426 0.385218514788 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0689648385674 0.0692045440612 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31029654454 0.275328986314 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226133590108 0.0653680567796 35% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.