As people rely on more and more technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Archaic proven facts about how Stone Age residents, rubbing two wooden branches rigorously to get the fire lit, to the modern day usage of phosphorous on the end of a small wooden processed wood, rubbed against another phosphorus on the side, in form of match sticks, has made the conundrum, quite easy. Well, to me that’s technology, making life easier.
From the difficulty in getting purified water to the ability to cut the growing nails using scissors, It’s what we think is a problem to us becomes foment in our mind that would be similar to someone else. That gives us the ability to think out of the box. Theories existed in nature, until someone, somewhere noticed and used mathematics and science to give out a statement, then hypothesis and finally a theory. “Eureka”, since Archimedes, is making lives easier! It’s when technocrats use some or the other ways to tackle a problem and devise a solution to that problem, using basic existing theories. Technology is nothing, but a word given to a solution that bridges the end user and the problem with a simple, effective and efficient solution. It’s the basic instinct of humans to think about oneselves and others, lets them design and use a technology that could lower ones efforts.
Technology has lowered the timeframe for a user to get to a solution to a complex problem. Has it not been known about the theory of lenses, one would still have difficulty seeing the outside surroundings with the use of spectacles. Not only the near sighted vision, but the ability to look in the outer space to explore for spaces outside earth, where life could exist has only been possible with the development of high magnification telescopes. From connecting people using the basic microwaves, to getting things done, by feeding commands in robots once and thus increasing the efficiency, technology is making humans life easier by thinking for others. It’s to make life at ease for humans that the problem solver thinks to reach the results efficiently with the use of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 16
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. 50
- As people rely on more and more technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 916, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnology that could lower ones efforts. Technology has lowered the timeframe for...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'thus', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266503667482 0.240241500013 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.161369193154 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0611246943765 0.0880659088768 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0366748166259 0.0497285424764 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0268948655257 0.0444667217837 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0953545232274 0.12292977631 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0660146699267 0.0406280797675 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76990760744 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0513447432763 0.030933414821 166% => OK
Particles: 0.00244498777506 0.0016655270985 147% => OK
Determiners: 0.107579462103 0.0997080785238 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00977995110024 0.0249443105267 39% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0171149144254 0.0148568991511 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2073.0 2732.02544248 76% => OK
No of words: 345.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00869565217 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359420289855 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286956521739 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171014492754 0.200843997647 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124637681159 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76990760744 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.48968727796 118% => OK
Word variations: 65.5073138572 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 24.6428571429 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3741582047 59.4972553346 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.071428571 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.674092028746 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 53.3385093168 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.90217391304 1.64882698954 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353601778627 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126338042558 0.123202303941 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0854563284244 0.077325440228 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.553310195322 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17682552686 0.149214159877 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166739301681 0.161403998019 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691054826893 0.0892212321368 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.427920971897 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103845805259 0.0692045440612 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269990989565 0.275328986314 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396280851021 0.0653680567796 61% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.