Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for colleagues or classmates to communicate in person than through emails in order to do a project.
The communication among the team members is a fundamental factor for doing a project. There is a list of way to communicate such as the face to face or email. While some people are convinced to use the email to exchange their idea with the team; others, on the other hand, prefer to have a face to face interaction. I personally agree with the first belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first reason which advocates my outlook is that the team members are accessible anytime with the email. In fact, the usage of the email eliminates the time restriction. The team members are capable of exchanging their data even at night. This situation provides an appropriate condition for preparing the project especially during the time near the due date. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue, is my own instance. When I was an architecture student, I had to do the lots of my final projects in the group. One of these projects was the urban analysis which was really arduous, and it required an intense communication with the team members to cover whole required aspects. Besides, we had a limited span for the presentation; thereby we did the big portion of the project at home. In this condition, the email was a primary resource for communication which made the team members to be available and participated in the debate as they are far apart.
The second clue which embraced my idea is that the email demolishes the meeting arrangement difficulties. It is evident as a crystal that the agreement for the group meeting is a hard task since each team members possesses a particular schedule differed from others' program. Therefore, finding the fixed time when total team members are free is a challenging situation. However, the utilization of the email omits this problem. The team members are accessible as they are accountable for the private issue. According to the noteworthy, intelligent survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-five percent of bosses in the Tehran prefer to use the internet chat to participate in the meeting exerted at the far away location. Consequently, they are able to observe the company's function and participate in the meeting at the identical time.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that the face to face connection have the few failures as the team members provide the solution for others' problem as soon as possible they face. They overlook this subtle point that the in the well-defined team program, which each is aware of his or her responsibility or duty, demands less advice to cope with his or her duty. Moreover, just by one message he or she can inform the entire groups about the emergency situation and ask for help.
To wrap it up, based on the whole aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the email is the decent primary of the communication between the team members. The email eliminates the restriction of time, and there is no problem with the team arrangement. All in all, I highly recommend the usage of the email for the group project which leads to the best outcome.
- tpo39 3
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 60
- tpo30 86
- tpo3 80
- 1 In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning 79
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'such as', 'on the whole', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254208754209 0.229887763892 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.139730639731 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0774410774411 0.0866891130778 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.03367003367 0.046263068375 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0488215488215 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114478114478 0.118717715034 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0185185185185 0.0351676179071 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8462495523 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0319865319865 0.0309702414327 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0016835016835 0.00188951952338 89% => OK
Determiners: 0.161616161616 0.0887237588012 182% => Less determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00841750841751 0.0209618222197 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151515151515 0.0139019557991 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3190.0 2387.08602151 134% => OK
No of words: 543.0 408.028673835 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87476979742 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314917127072 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.259668508287 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180478821363 0.174417080927 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121546961326 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8462495523 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493554327808 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 59.2496141792 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6684587814 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1111111111 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5237769316 48.84282405 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.148148148 120.699889404 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.703703703704 0.644075263715 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 46.0779619398 45.7405998639 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.74242424242 1.45489161554 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286601351236 0.300154397459 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10175360859 0.103427244359 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.076869956592 0.0752933317313 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587931716416 0.497263757937 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124952227101 0.151897553556 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124204548726 0.114077575197 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513777244466 0.0781384742642 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.556275591388 0.336927656856 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0963048239133 0.067059652881 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224352445366 0.210909579961 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382780551067 0.0618886996521 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.