The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Learners' growth depends upon the response they receive from their teachers. Positive response leads to positive feelings associated with a particular action or behavior, and negative response produces negative feelings with the task. It then becomes important to know the best way to teach. I believe a teacher should never ignore the negative actions just to avoid the bad feelings in the learner; they should be instead completely honest.
A child's growth immensely depends upon the feedback he or she receives. The abilities are greatly enhanced if good amount of praise is received. It makes a child confident in his or her abilities. But too much praise can make the child over-confident and boastful, something which is undesirable in a healthy adult. Temperance is they key here. Another case in which praising positive actions can be bad for a learner is when the praising stops for some reason, such as when the teacher is absent, in which case the learner would not be sure whether their actions is correct or not. The teacher should, thus, enable learners to judge on their own the validity of their actions.
The most controversial issue is the response of a teacher (which could be a parent of a child) in case of an undesirable action of the learner. While some would argue that negative feedbacks in form of scoldings and punishment hinders a child's emotional growth, it is to be realized that not doing so would do the same but worse. The scoldings and beratings are servere only in miniscule cases when there is psychological problem with the teachers themselves. In normal cases, the scoldings and punishments act as congnative associations in a learner, in this case a child, which prevents them to repeat the action in the future--which is the goal of teaching, it's essence. In a case where no negative feedback is received by learners, they would either assume their action to be acceptable, or even worse: they would assume it to be something to manipulate people with. Both the cases would lead to the development of poor human beings, and in the latter case, even criminals.
It is seen that the parents who can't be serious with child, unable to reprimand them for some reason, and show too much love, raise them to be arrogant. So many cliched plots in the movies which have spoiled teenagers of rich family have them because that is how the human nature is: in absence of a forces to check the behavior, the children don't learn the right disposition. All such real life examples bolster the fact that humans psychology works in a way that absence of negative feedback leads to wild behavior. This argument could be easily extended to general cases of learner and teacher relationship.
Having a realistic view of self is important. It is only when we can predict our correct place is when we can decide our next step with most efficiency. Dishonest praise, as well as dishonest criticism, can lead to self assessment differing from reality. Honesty then seems to be the best policy for a teacher to have. Thus, to say that a teacher should ignore the negative actions of learner is completely disingineous. The teacher should give honest negative review, and then MOTIVATE the learner to do better. To prevent negative result on the emotions, a teacher should make sure that they are not criticizing the learners themselves, but their actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-12 | ShrutiUrkude | 50 | view |
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances,times and places. 58
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 54
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain ofvideo rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses atMovies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are fam 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s. It is seen that the parents who cant be serious with child, unable to reprim...
^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a force' or simply 'forces'?
Suggestion: a force; forces
... how the human nature is: in absence of a forces to check the behavior, the children don...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ces to check the behavior, the children dont learn the right disposition. All such r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...eal life examples bolster the fact that humans psychology works in a way that absence ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22028526149 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.145800316957 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109350237718 0.0880659088768 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0522979397781 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.053882725832 0.0444667217837 121% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0998415213946 0.12292977631 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0190174326466 0.0406280797675 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.66593901972 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0348652931854 0.030933414821 113% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109350237718 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0301109350238 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0237717908082 0.0148568991511 160% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3383.0 2732.02544248 124% => OK
No of words: 573.0 452.878318584 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90401396161 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363001745201 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282722513089 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186736474695 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106457242583 0.132149295362 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66593901972 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 219.290929204 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471204188482 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 56.7184436248 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4642857143 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8070362681 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.821428571 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4642857143 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.321428571429 0.674092028746 48% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 48.7365370232 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.34591194969 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481853137116 0.391690518653 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100376678218 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0616817559054 0.077325440228 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.47282667925 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146846625969 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176528767214 0.161403998019 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902941932603 0.0892212321368 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.440600281152 0.385218514788 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102265230618 0.0692045440612 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355423231891 0.275328986314 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415568754716 0.0653680567796 64% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.