integrated 47
The reading passage concentrates on three theories that illustrate Pterosaurs could not fly. On the other hand, the professor refutes these theories due to following reasons.
First, even though the reading passage states that the Pterosaurs were cold-blooded and they could not fly since only warm-blooded birds can, the speaker contends that as evidenced by fossil records, there is fur covering on the body of Pterosaurs which elucidates they were warm-blooded and they use this mechanism in order to protect themselves on different weather circumstances.
Second, despite the statement in the reading passage that the Pterosaurs did not have adequate power to fly due to their heavy weight, the lecturer claims that the anatomic features of Pterosaurs reveals the fact that the Pterosaurs were light since their bones were hollow compared to other birds and in this way, they could flap easily and their weight was not a restriction for them.
Finally, the reading passage explains that the Pterosaurs did not have powerful muscles in their back legs similar to other birds in order to take off. Conversely, the speaker points out that the Pterosaurs just did not use the back leg in order to take off and they used all their four legs in order to run quickly and also, take off from the land.
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that is a good quality for a person 85
- integrated 48 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- integrated topic 80
- integrated 42 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...have adequate power to fly due to their heavy weight, the lecturer claims that the anatomic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237068965517 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.159482758621 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0689655172414 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0646551724138 0.0435111971325 149% => OK
Pronouns: 0.051724137931 0.0277247811725 187% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120689655172 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0172413793103 0.0370669169778 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.56128166193 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0387931034483 0.0208969081088 186% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0172413793103 0.00154638098197 1115% => OK
Determiners: 0.10775862069 0.128158765124 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0172413793103 0.0158828679856 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00862068965517 0.0114777025283 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1299.0 1645.83664459 79% => OK
No of words: 216.0 271.125827815 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01388888889 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.310185185185 0.374372842146 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268518518519 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175925925926 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111111111111 0.113142543107 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56128166193 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 47.2331196859 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.7502111507 166% => OK
Sentence length SD: 125.543374532 49.3711431718 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 216.5 132.220823453 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 21.7502111507 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 0.878197800319 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 62.8518518519 50.5018328374 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.359375 1.90840788429 71% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.303034349866 0.142949733639 212% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.131337459028 0.0787303798458 167% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.859907193839 0.631733273073 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119288913993 0.139662658121 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.400630808042 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0874403357765 0.0530846634433 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.