integrated 44
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the silver coin which found in Native American archaeological site. In the reading section, the writer contends that coin is fake and he provides three reasons of support; however the professor casts doubts on reading points by indicating that coin is not fake.
First of all, the writer claims that since Maine site was far from Norse settlements, coin was not related to settlements; in contrast, the professor casts rejects this notion by indicating that other objects have come from other places too and people could travel to distant places.
Moreover, the reading passage holds the view that Norse did not bring silver coins with them because there were no other coins at the Canadian sites; on the contrary, the lecturer underlines the fact that European packed voyage and then returned back theses coins with themselves.
In addition, the writer mentions that Norse understood that silver coins were useless for native North Americans; conversely the professor indicates that native American people have valued coins because of their beauties and they have used them as jewelry and necklace.
- integrated 48 60
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 86
- integrated 46 63
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...ct that European packed voyage and then returned back theses coins with themselves. In addit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.17 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.075 0.0723426182421 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05 0.0435111971325 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.03 0.0277247811725 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.035 0.0370669169778 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37253005582 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.01 0.0208969081088 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.005 0.00154638098197 323% => OK
Determiners: 0.095 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.005 0.0158828679856 31% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01 0.0114777025283 87% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1144.0 1645.83664459 70% => OK
No of words: 184.0 271.125827815 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21739130435 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04852973271 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385869565217 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266304347826 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16847826087 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103260869565 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37253005582 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 56.3766451529 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0529801325 38% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 36.8 21.7502111507 169% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4169118249 49.3711431718 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 228.8 132.220823453 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8 21.7502111507 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 0.878197800319 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 63.4304347826 50.5018328374 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.86 1.90840788429 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.214820038468 0.142949733639 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0560996078853 0.0787303798458 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.911293889533 0.631733273073 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121678063116 0.139662658121 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.247345525861 0.414875509568 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0534549039513 0.0530846634433 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.